These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29271665)

  • 1. Compatibility of booster seats and vehicles in the U.S. market.
    Bing JA; Agnew AM; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 May; 19(4):385-390. PubMed ID: 29271665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of vehicle seat and belt geometry on belt fit for children with and without belt positioning booster seats.
    Reed MP; Ebert-Hamilton SM; Klinich KD; Manary MA; Rupp JD
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():512-22. PubMed ID: 22703990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Geometry of rear seats and child restraints compared to child anthropometry.
    Bilston LE; Sagar N
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2007 Oct; 51():275-98. PubMed ID: 18278601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of ISO CRS Envelopes Relative to U.S. Vehicles and Child Restraint Systems.
    Hu J; Manary MA; Klinich KD; Reed MP
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(8):781-5. PubMed ID: 25665176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Belt fit for children in vehicle seats with and without belt-positioning boosters.
    West BA; Reed MP; Benedick A; De Leonardis D; Huey R; Sauber-Schatz E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(8):488-493. PubMed ID: 36026460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of Child Restraint System (CRS) Compatibility in the Vehicle Seat Environment.
    Bing JA; Bolte JH; Agnew AM
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S1-8. PubMed ID: 26436217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Naturalistic driving study of rear seat child occupants: Quantification of head position using a Kinect™ sensor.
    Arbogast KB; Kim J; Loeb H; Kuo J; Koppel S; Bohman K; Charlton JL
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():168-74. PubMed ID: 27586119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Child Posture and Belt Fit in a Range of Booster Configurations.
    Jones MLH; Ebert S; Manary MA; Reed MP; Klinich KD
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 32012975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Head excursion in frontal impacts is lower in high back booster seats than in forward facing child seats with internal harnesses designed for children up to 8 years of age.
    Bilston LE; Mills E; Kent N; Brown J; Whyte T
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(5):244-249. PubMed ID: 35333678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Belt-positioning booster seats and reduction in risk of injury among children in vehicle crashes.
    Durbin DR; Elliott MR; Winston FK
    JAMA; 2003 Jun; 289(21):2835-40. PubMed ID: 12783914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the static belt fit provided by belt-positioning booster seats.
    Reed MP; Ebert SM; Sherwood CP; Klinich KD; Manary MA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 May; 41(3):598-607. PubMed ID: 19393812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinematics and shoulder belt engagement of children on belt-positioning boosters during evasive steering maneuvers.
    Baker G; Stockman I; Bohman K; Jakobsson L; Osvalder AL; Svensson M; Wimmerstedt M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S131-S138. PubMed ID: 29584480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Kinematics of pediatric crash dummies seated on vehicle seats with realistic belt geometry.
    Klinich KD; Reed MP; Ebert SM; Rupp JD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):866-74. PubMed ID: 24884476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of booster seats compared with no restraint or seat belt alone for crash injury prevention.
    Ma X; Griffin R; McGwin G; Allison DB; Heymsfield SB; He W; Zhu S
    Acad Emerg Med; 2013 Sep; 20(9):880-7. PubMed ID: 24050794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting vehicle belt fit for children ages 6-12.
    Reed MP; Klinich KD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016; 17(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 26507688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Booster cushion design effects on child occupant kinematics and loading assessed using the PIPER 6-year-old HBM and the Q10 ATD in frontal impacts.
    Bohman K; Östh J; Jakobsson L; Stockman I; Wimmerstedt M; Wallin H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S25-S30. PubMed ID: 32816572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in child passenger safety practices in Indiana from 2009 to 2015.
    O'Neil J; Bull MJ; Talty J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S191-S194. PubMed ID: 29584489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Vehicle LATCH system features associated with correct child restraint installations.
    Klinich KD; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT; Manary MA; Moore JL; Wells JK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):520-31. PubMed ID: 23683089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of LATCH vs. non-LATCH installations for boosters in frontal impacts.
    Mansfield JA; Baker GH; Ramachandra R; Bolte JH
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S93-S98. PubMed ID: 34379543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Booster Seat Design on Children's Choice of Seating Positions During Naturalistic Riding.
    Andersson M; Bohman K; Osvalder AL
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2010; 54():171-80. PubMed ID: 21050601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.