These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29271668)

  • 1. Acoustic environments that support equally accessible oral higher education as a human right.
    Van Den Heuij KML; Neijenhuis K; Coene M
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Feb; 20(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 29271668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of an Application to Verify Classroom Acoustic Recommendations for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing in a General Education Setting.
    Spratford M; Walker EA; McCreery RW
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 28(4):927-934. PubMed ID: 31682768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noise disturbance in open-plan study environments: a field study on noise sources, student tasks and room acoustic parameters.
    Braat-Eggen PE; van Heijst A; Hornikx M; Kohlrausch A
    Ergonomics; 2017 Sep; 60(9):1297-1314. PubMed ID: 28287041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of sound-field systems on learning and attention in elementary school classrooms.
    Dockrell JE; Shield B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 55(4):1163-76. PubMed ID: 22232398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Noise and its interference over students in a classroom environment: literature review].
    Raquel Cecília Fischer D; Momensohn-Santos T
    Pro Fono; 2005; 17(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16909535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustics in educational settings. Subcommittee on Acoustics in Educational Settings of the Bioacoustics Standards and Noise Standards Committee American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    ASHA Suppl; 1995 Mar; 37(3 Suppl 14):15-9. PubMed ID: 7696882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing communication accessibility in the university classroom: towards a goal of universal hearing accessibility.
    Cheesman MF; Jennings MB; Klinger L
    Work; 2013; 46(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 24004801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional hearing in the classroom: assistive listening devices for students with hearing impairment in a mainstream school setting.
    Zanin J; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55(12):723-729. PubMed ID: 27609144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The human right to communicate: A survey of available services in Saudi Arabia.
    Khoja MA; Sheeshah H
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Feb; 20(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 29400571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting speech interference in classrooms.
    Picard M; Bradley JS
    Audiology; 2001; 40(5):221-44. PubMed ID: 11688542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Scoping Review of the Effect of Classroom Acoustic Conditions on University Students' Listening, Learning, and Well-Being.
    Mealings K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Nov; 66(11):4653-4672. PubMed ID: 37734163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of room acoustics and sound-field amplification on word recognition performance in young adult listeners in suboptimal listening conditions.
    Larsen JB; Vega A; Ribera JE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 18519579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective assessment of listening environments in university classrooms: perceptions of students.
    Kennedy SM; Hodgson M; Edgett LD; Lamb N; Rempel R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):299-309. PubMed ID: 16454285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Communication as a human right: Citizenship, politics and the role of the speech-language pathologist.
    Murphy D; Lyons R; Carroll C; Caulfield M; De Paor G
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Feb; 20(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 29192799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of different open plan and enclosed classroom acoustic conditions on speech perception in Kindergarten children.
    Mealings KT; Demuth K; Buchholz JM; Dillon H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Oct; 138(4):2458-69. PubMed ID: 26520328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using personal response systems to assess speech perception within the classroom: an approach to determine the efficacy of sound field amplification in primary school classrooms.
    Vickers DA; Backus BC; Macdonald NK; Rostamzadeh NK; Mason NK; Pandya R; Marriage JE; Mahon MH
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):491-502. PubMed ID: 23340455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Knowledge and attitudes of teachers regarding the impact of classroom acoustics on speech perception and learning.
    Ramma L
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2009; 56():35-47. PubMed ID: 20235492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and listening comprehension of children and adults in a classroom-like setting.
    Klatte M; Lachmann T; Meis M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(49):270-82. PubMed ID: 20871182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.