These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2927183)
1. Expected utility theory and risky choices with health outcomes. Hellinger FJ Med Care; 1989 Mar; 27(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 2927183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The measurement of patients' values in medicine. Llewellyn-Thomas H; Sutherland HJ; Tibshirani R; Ciampi A; Till JE; Boyd NF Med Decis Making; 1982; 2(4):449-62. PubMed ID: 7182703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk attitude in gambles with years of life: empirical support for prospect theory. Verhoef LC; de Haan AF; van Daal WA Med Decis Making; 1994; 14(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8028473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Explaining distortions in utility elicitation through the rank-dependent model for risky choices. Wakker P; Stiggelbout A Med Decis Making; 1995; 15(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 7783579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do Probability and Certainty Equivalent Techniques Lead to Inconsistent Results? Evidence from Gambles Involving Life-Years and Quality of Life. Ruggeri M; Coretti S Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):413-24. PubMed ID: 26091595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Disjunction Effect in two-stage simulated gambles. An experimental study and comparison of a heuristic logistic, Markov and quantum-like model. Broekaert JB; Busemeyer JR; Pothos EM Cogn Psychol; 2020 Mar; 117():101262. PubMed ID: 31865226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do risk attitudes differ across domains and respondent types? Prosser LA; Wittenberg E Med Decis Making; 2007; 27(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 17545498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing utility functions between risky and riskless choice in rhesus monkeys. Bujold PM; Seak LCU; Schultz W; Ferrari-Toniolo S Anim Cogn; 2022 Apr; 25(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 34568979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The description-experience gap in risky choice in nonhuman primates. Heilbronner SR; Hayden BY Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):593-600. PubMed ID: 26286883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The probabilistic nature of preferential choice. Rieskamp J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1446-65. PubMed ID: 18980407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exaggerated risk: prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice. Kusev P; van Schaik P; Ayton P; Dent J; Chater N J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1487-505. PubMed ID: 19857019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual classification of strong risk attitudes: An application across lottery types and age groups. Kellen D; Mata R; Davis-Stober CP Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1341-1349. PubMed ID: 28063131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dealing With Uncertainty: Testing Risk- and Ambiguity-Attitude Across Adolescence. Blankenstein NE; Crone EA; van den Bos W; van Duijvenvoorde AC Dev Neuropsychol; 2016; 41(1-2):77-92. PubMed ID: 27028162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the composition of risk preference and belief. Wakkar PP Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 14756595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decoy effects in intertemporal and probabilistic choices the role of time pressure, immediacy, and certainty. Marini M; Paglieri F Behav Processes; 2019 May; 162():130-141. PubMed ID: 30849515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk attitudes of anesthesiologists and surgeons in clinical decision making with expected years of life. Nakata Y; Okuno-Fujiwara M; Goto T; Morita S J Clin Anesth; 2000 Mar; 12(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 10818330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A framework for estimating health state utility values within a discrete choice experiment: modeling risky choices. Robinson A; Spencer A; Moffatt P Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 25349189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age, Loss Minimization, and the Role of Probability for Decision-Making. Best R; Freund AM Gerontology; 2018; 64(5):475-484. PubMed ID: 29621760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]