These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2927183)

  • 21. Individual utilities are inconsistent with rationing choices: A partial explanation of why Oregon's cost-effectiveness list failed.
    Ubel PA; Loewenstein G; Scanlon D; Kamlet M
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 8778528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incorporating risk attitude into Markov-process decision models: importance for individual decision making.
    Cher DJ; Miyamoto J; Lenert LA
    Med Decis Making; 1997; 17(3):340-50. PubMed ID: 9219195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory.
    Wu Q; Vanerum M; Agten A; Christiansen A; Vandenabeele F; Rigo JM; Janssen R
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):518-543. PubMed ID: 33928520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The discrepancy between risky and riskless utilities: a matter of framing?
    Stalmeier PF; Bezembinder TG
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(4):435-47. PubMed ID: 10520682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement.
    Abellan-Perpiñan JM; Bleichrodt H; Pinto-Prades JL
    J Health Econ; 2009 Dec; 28(6):1039-47. PubMed ID: 19833400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intensity of chemotherapy-induced emesis and overall survival as determinants of a global utility score.
    Grunberg SM; Srivastava A; Grunberg KJ; Weeks J
    Support Care Cancer; 2002 Nov; 10(8):624-9. PubMed ID: 12436221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aging and loss decision making: increased risk aversion and decreased use of maximizing information, with correlated rationality and value maximization.
    Kurnianingsih YA; Sim SK; Chee MW; Mullette-Gillman OA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():280. PubMed ID: 26029092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Testing the internal consistency of the standard gamble in 'success' and 'failure' frames.
    Oliver A
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 58(11):2219-29. PubMed ID: 15047079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attention in risky choice.
    Brandstätter E; Körner C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Oct; 152():166-76. PubMed ID: 25226548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changing plans: dynamic inconsistency and the effect of experience on the reference point.
    Barkan R; Busemeyer JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Dec; 6(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 10682196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Framing and conflict: aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice.
    Schneider SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Sep; 18(5):1040-57. PubMed ID: 1402709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The neural basis of risky choice with affective outcomes.
    Suter RS; Pachur T; Hertwig R; Endestad T; Biele G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0122475. PubMed ID: 25830918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of d-amphetamine on risk choice in rats depend on the manner in which the expected reward value is varied.
    Yang JH; Cheng CP; Liao RM
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2018 Aug; 171():20-29. PubMed ID: 29782943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Information overload or search-amplified risk? Set size and order effects on decisions from experience.
    Hills TT; Noguchi T; Gibbert M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 23516097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Investigating the origin and consequences of endogenous default options in repeated economic choices.
    Couto J; van Maanen L; Lebreton M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0232385. PubMed ID: 32790729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sizing up information distortion: quantifying its effect on the subjective values of choice options.
    DeKay ML; Stone ER; Sorenson CM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Apr; 19(2):349-56. PubMed ID: 22135106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Human risky choice in a repeated-gambles procedure: an up-linkage replication of Lakshminarayanan, Chen and Santos (2011).
    Silberberg A; Parker S; Allouch C; Fabos M; Hoberman H; McDonald L; Murphy M; Olson A; Wyatt L
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Nov; 16(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 23526161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Negative emotion or problem content? Testing explanations of the peanuts effect.
    Suzuki S
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Feb; 116(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 25629526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cognitive models of risky choice: parameter stability and predictive accuracy of prospect theory.
    Glöckner A; Pachur T
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 22226615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The description-experience gap in risky choice.
    Hertwig R; Erev I
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Dec; 13(12):517-23. PubMed ID: 19836292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.