BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29272307)

  • 1. Parent-progeny imputation from pooled samples for cost-efficient genotyping in plant breeding.
    Technow F; Gerke J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0190271. PubMed ID: 29272307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whole-genome characterization in pedigreed non-human primates using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and imputation.
    Bimber BN; Raboin MJ; Letaw J; Nevonen KA; Spindel JE; McCouch SR; Cervera-Juanes R; Spindel E; Carbone L; Ferguson B; Vinson A
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):676. PubMed ID: 27558348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
    Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
    BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imputation of non-genotyped sheep from the genotypes of their mates and resulting progeny.
    Berry DP; McHugh N; Randles S; Wall E; McDermott K; Sargolzaei M; O'Brien AC
    Animal; 2018 Feb; 12(2):191-198. PubMed ID: 28712375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Applications of genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in maize genetics and breeding.
    Wang N; Yuan Y; Wang H; Yu D; Liu Y; Zhang A; Gowda M; Nair SK; Hao Z; Lu Y; San Vicente F; Prasanna BM; Li X; Zhang X
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16308. PubMed ID: 33004874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating Imputation Algorithms for Low-Depth Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) Data.
    Chan AW; Hamblin MT; Jannink JL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160733. PubMed ID: 27537694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A joint use of pooling and imputation for genotyping SNPs.
    Clouard C; Ausmees K; Nettelblad C
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Oct; 23(1):421. PubMed ID: 36229780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
    Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing low-pass sequencing and genotyping for trait mapping in pharmacogenetics.
    Wasik K; Berisa T; Pickrell JK; Li JH; Fraser DJ; King K; Cox C
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):197. PubMed ID: 33743587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.
    Torkamaneh D; Belzile F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131533. PubMed ID: 26161900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic dissection of maize plant architecture with an ultra-high density bin map based on recombinant inbred lines.
    Zhou Z; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Hao Z; Wang Z; Zeng X; Di H; Li M; Zhang D; Yong H; Zhang S; Weng J; Li X
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():178. PubMed ID: 26940065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of whole-genome sequence imputation using hybrid peeling in large pedigreed livestock populations.
    Ros-Freixedes R; Whalen A; Chen CY; Gorjanc G; Herring WO; Mileham AJ; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Apr; 52(1):17. PubMed ID: 32248811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genotyping-by-Sequencing on Pooled Samples and its Use in Measuring Segregation Bias during the Course of Androgenesis in Barley.
    Bélanger S; Esteves P; Clermont I; Jean M; Belzile F
    Plant Genome; 2016 Mar; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 27898767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of imputing markers from a low-density chip on the reliability of genomic breeding values in Holstein populations.
    Dassonneville R; Brøndum RF; Druet T; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Ducrocq V; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jul; 94(7):3679-86. PubMed ID: 21700057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of genotype imputation based on random and selected reference sets in purebred and crossbred sheep populations and its effect on accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Moghaddar N; Gore KP; Daetwyler HD; Hayes BJ; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():97. PubMed ID: 26694131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practical Workflow from High-Throughput Genotyping to Genomic Estimated Breeding Values (GEBVs).
    Contaldi F; Cappetta E; Esposito S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2264():119-135. PubMed ID: 33263907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
    Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.