These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29273030)

  • 21. Examining the use of health systems and policy research in the health policymaking process in Israel: views of researchers.
    Ellen ME; Lavis JN; Shemer J
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Sep; 14(1):66. PubMed ID: 27585630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Symbiotic empirical ethics: a practical methodology.
    Frith L
    Bioethics; 2012 May; 26(4):198-206. PubMed ID: 21039690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of knowledge and self-efficacy among health professionals and clinical scientists following the Cameroon HIV/AIDS Research Forum (CAM-HERO 2022) research methodology and bioethics training.
    Ebasone PV; Tiam A; Tchendjou P; Foaleng M; Khan EM; Ajeh R; Tchounga B; Nforbih Shu E; Mabou G; Melpsa J; Muffih PT; Kengne AP; Zoung-Kany Bisseck AC; Dzudie A; Thienemann F
    Pan Afr Med J; 2024; 47():91. PubMed ID: 38799186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The acceptability among health researchers and clinicians of social media to translate research evidence to clinical practice: mixed-methods survey and interview study.
    Tunnecliff J; Ilic D; Morgan P; Keating J; Gaida JE; Clearihan L; Sadasivan S; Davies D; Ganesh S; Mohanty P; Weiner J; Reynolds J; Maloney S
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 May; 17(5):e119. PubMed ID: 25995192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Medical researchers' perceptions regarding research evaluation: a web-based survey in Japan.
    Minoura A; Shimada Y; Kuwahara K; Kondo M; Fukushima H; Sugiyama T
    BMJ Open; 2024 May; 14(5):e079269. PubMed ID: 38724056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Conceptual Model for the Translation of Bioethics Research and Scholarship.
    Mathews DJ; Hester DM; Kahn J; McGuire A; McKinney R; Meador K; Philpott-Jones S; Youngner S; Wilfond BS
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016 Sep; 46(5):34-9. PubMed ID: 27649827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A method of reflexive balancing in a pragmatic, interdisciplinary and reflexive bioethics.
    Ives J
    Bioethics; 2014 Jul; 28(6):302-12. PubMed ID: 23444909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Early-career researchers' views on ethical dimensions of patient engagement in research.
    Bélisle-Pipon JC; Rouleau G; Birko S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Mar; 19(1):21. PubMed ID: 29514618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The NIH and bioethics: what should be done?
    Emanuel E
    Acad Med; 2008 Jun; 83(6):529-31. PubMed ID: 18520451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Survey of Scientist and Policy Makers' Attitudes Toward Research on Stored Human Biological Materials in Sri Lanka.
    Dissanayake VH; Sumathipala DS; Kariyawasam UG; Jayamanne JM; Nisansala PK; Lie R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2015 Dec; 15(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 25280225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The value of bioethical research: A qualitative literature analysis of researchers' statements.
    Mertz M; Fischer T; Salloch S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220438. PubMed ID: 31356629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Informed consent and collaborative research: perspectives from the developing world.
    Hyder AA; Wali SA
    Dev World Bioeth; 2006 Mar; 6(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 16436172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Using empirical research to formulate normative ethical principles in biomedicine.
    Ebbesen M; Pedersen BD
    Med Health Care Philos; 2007 Mar; 10(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 16955345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Empirical population and public health ethics: A review and critical analysis to advance robust empirical-normative inquiry.
    Knight R
    Health (London); 2016 May; 20(3):274-90. PubMed ID: 25956917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations.
    Haimes E
    Bioethics; 2002 Apr; 16(2):89-113. PubMed ID: 12083157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of diploma in bioethics programme, Karachi, Pakistan: An educational research.
    Shamim MS; Shirazi B; Omair A
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2015 Apr; 65(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 25976575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The birth of the "digital turn" in bioethics?
    Salloch S; Ursin F
    Bioethics; 2023 Mar; 37(3):285-291. PubMed ID: 36308764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Design Bioethics: A Theoretical Framework and Argument for Innovation in Bioethics Research.
    Pavarini G; McMillan R; Robinson A; Singh I
    Am J Bioeth; 2021 Jun; 21(6):37-50. PubMed ID: 33502959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Untapped ethical resources for neurodegeneration research.
    Robillard JM; Federico CA; Tairyan K; Ivinson AJ; Illes J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2011 Jun; 12():9. PubMed ID: 21635769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Research across the disciplines: a road map for quality criteria in empirical ethics research.
    Mertz M; Inthorn J; Renz G; Rothenberger LG; Salloch S; Schildmann J; Wöhlke S; Schicktanz S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():17. PubMed ID: 24580847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.