These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29273037)

  • 1. Economic and organizational impact of a clinical decision support system on laboratory test ordering.
    Bellodi E; Vagnoni E; Bonvento B; Lamma E
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29273037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerised decision support systems in order communication for diagnostic, screening or monitoring test ordering: systematic reviews of the effects and cost-effectiveness of systems.
    Main C; Moxham T; Wyatt JC; Kay J; Anderson R; Stein K
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(48):1-227. PubMed ID: 21034668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electronic Laboratory Medicine ordering with evidence-based Order sets in primary care (ELMO study): protocol for a cluster randomised trial.
    Delvaux N; De Sutter A; Van de Velde S; Ramaekers D; Fieuws S; Aertgeerts B
    Implement Sci; 2017 Dec; 12(1):147. PubMed ID: 29212546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Costs associated with implementation of computer-assisted clinical decision support system for antenatal and delivery care: case study of Kassena-Nankana district of northern Ghana.
    Dalaba MA; Akweongo P; Williams J; Saronga HP; Tonchev P; Sauerborn R; Mensah N; Blank A; Kaltschmidt J; Loukanova S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106416. PubMed ID: 25180831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of an electronic medication ordering system (CPOE/CDSS) in hospitalized patients.
    Vermeulen KM; van Doormaal JE; Zaal RJ; Mol PG; Lenderink AW; Haaijer-Ruskamp FM; Kosterink JG; van den Bemt PM
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Aug; 83(8):572-80. PubMed ID: 24929633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reducing Unnecessary Phlebotomy Testing Using a Clinical Decision Support System.
    Strockbine VL; Gehrie EA; Zhou QP; Guzzetta CE
    J Healthc Qual; 2020; 42(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 31972663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost consequences of implementing an electronic decision support system for ordering laboratory tests in primary care: evidence from a controlled prospective study in the Netherlands.
    Poley MJ; Edelenbos KI; Mosseveld M; van Wijk MA; de Bakker DH; van der Lei J; Rutten-van Mölken MP
    Clin Chem; 2007 Feb; 53(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17185371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory test ordering in inpatient hospitals: a systematic review on the effects and features of clinical decision support systems.
    Zare S; Meidani Z; Shirdeli M; Nabovati E
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Jan; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 33461548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial.
    Delvaux N; Piessens V; Burghgraeve T; Mamouris P; Vaes B; Stichele RV; Cloetens H; Thomas J; Ramaekers D; Sutter A; Aertgeerts B
    Implement Sci; 2020 Nov; 15(1):100. PubMed ID: 33148311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of pharmacy computerised clinical decision support on prescribing, clinical and patient outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.
    Robertson J; Walkom E; Pearson SA; Hains I; Williamsone M; Newby D
    Int J Pharm Pract; 2010 Apr; 18(2):69-87. PubMed ID: 20441116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost of installing and operating an electronic clinical decision support system for maternal health care: case of Tanzania rural primary health centres.
    Saronga HP; Dalaba MA; Dong H; Leshabari M; Sauerborn R; Sukums F; Blank A; Kaltschmidt J; Loukanova S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Apr; 15():132. PubMed ID: 25888762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of computerized decision support systems in Italian hospitals: a grounded theory study].
    Liberati EG; Galuppo L; Gorli M; Maraldi M; Ruggiero F; Capobussi M; Banzi R; Kwag K; Scaratti G; Nanni O; Ruggieri P; Polo Friz H; Cimminiello C; Bosio M; Mangia M; Moja L
    Recenti Prog Med; 2015 Apr; 106(4):180-91. PubMed ID: 25959891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of computerised decision support systems on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review and user contextualisation.
    Thompson C; Mebrahtu T; Skyrme S; Bloor K; Andre D; Keenan AM; Ledward A; Yang H; Randell R
    Health Soc Care Deliv Res; 2023 Jun; ():1-85. PubMed ID: 37470324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of an Electronic Medical Record-Based Clinical Decision Support System on Adherence to Clinical Protocols in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care: Interrupted Time Series Study.
    Sutton RT; Chappell KD; Pincock D; Sadowski D; Baumgart DC; Kroeker KI
    JMIR Med Inform; 2024 Mar; 12():e55314. PubMed ID: 38533825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized trial of a clinical decision support system: impact on the management of children with fever without apparent source.
    Roukema J; Steyerberg EW; van der Lei J; Moll HA
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2008; 15(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 17947627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of computerized clinical decision support systems in specialty hospitals: protocol for a qualitative cross-sectional study.
    Moja L; Liberati EG; Galuppo L; Gorli M; Maraldi M; Nanni O; Rigon G; Ruggieri P; Ruggiero F; Scaratti G; Vaona A; Kwag KH
    Implement Sci; 2014 Aug; 9():105. PubMed ID: 25163794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical decision support systems at the Vienna General Hospital using Arden Syntax: Design, implementation, and integration.
    Schuh C; de Bruin JS; Seeling W
    Artif Intell Med; 2018 Nov; 92():24-33. PubMed ID: 26706047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation.
    Liberati EG; Ruggiero F; Galuppo L; Gorli M; González-Lorenzo M; Maraldi M; Ruggieri P; Polo Friz H; Scaratti G; Kwag KH; Vespignani R; Moja L
    Implement Sci; 2017 Sep; 12(1):113. PubMed ID: 28915822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the role of professional identity in the implementation of clinical decision support systems-a narrative review.
    Ackerhans S; Huynh T; Kaiser C; Schultz C
    Implement Sci; 2024 Feb; 19(1):11. PubMed ID: 38347525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptance of clinical decision support surveillance technology in the clinical pharmacy.
    English D; Ankem K; English K
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2017 Mar; 42(2):135-152. PubMed ID: 26890621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.