These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2927310)

  • 1. Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm.
    Hayman CA; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 2927310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lexical factors in the word-superiority effect.
    Hildebrandt N; Caplan D; Sokol S; Torreano L
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 7885263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word and pseudoword superiority effects: Evidence from a shallow orthography language.
    Ripamonti E; Luzzatti C; Zoccolotti P; Traficante D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Sep; 71(9):1911-1920. PubMed ID: 28770652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word and pseudoword superiority effects on letter position processing in developing and skilled readers.
    Kezilas Y; Kohnen S; McKague M; Robidoux S; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1989-2002. PubMed ID: 27732042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional demands of visual word recognition.
    Herdman CM; Dobbs AR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Feb; 15(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 2522522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual specificity effects on word stem completion: beyond transfer appropriate processing?
    Curran T; Schacter DL; Bessenoff G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1996 Mar; 50(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 8653095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.
    Johnson NF; Allen PA; Strand TL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):474-82. PubMed ID: 2761405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 1435271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. From word superiority to word inferiority: visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia.
    Habekost T; Petersen A; Behrmann M; Starrfelt R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):413-36. PubMed ID: 24801564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contextual facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed.
    Smith MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 528936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visually-presented letter strings typically are encoded phonologically: some converging evidence.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1987 Apr; 114(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 3585296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition.
    Becker CA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 528937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ease of identifying words degraded by visual noise.
    Barber P; de la Mahotière C
    Br J Psychol; 1982 Aug; 73 (Pt 3)():371-81. PubMed ID: 7116083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lateralized lexical decision in schizophrenia: hemispheric specialization and interhemispheric lexicality priming.
    Narr KL; Green MF; Capetillo-Cunliffe L; Toga AW; Zaidel E
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2003 Nov; 112(4):623-32. PubMed ID: 14674874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.