These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2927316)

  • 1. Processing of new arguments at clause boundaries.
    Haberlandt K; Graesser AC
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):186-93. PubMed ID: 2927316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading strategies of fast and slow readers.
    Haberlandt KF; Graesser AC; Schneider NJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):815-23. PubMed ID: 2528604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: the case of Spanish subject- and object-relative clauses.
    del Río D; López-Higes R; Martín-Aragoneses MT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2108-28. PubMed ID: 22524672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Age and Location in Chinese Relative Clauses Processing.
    He W; Xu N; Ji R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1067-1086. PubMed ID: 28236141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On-line processing of written text by younger and older adults.
    Stine EA
    Psychol Aging; 1990 Mar; 5(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 2317303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of sentence form on the construction of mental plans from procedural discourse.
    Dixon P; Harrison K; Taylor D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):375-400. PubMed ID: 8364535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.
    MacDonald MC; Just MA; Carpenter PA
    Cogn Psychol; 1992 Jan; 24(1):56-98. PubMed ID: 1537232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve.
    Payne BR; Gao X; Noh SR; Anderson CJ; Stine-Morrow EA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2012; 19(1-2):122-49. PubMed ID: 22149149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Processing Italian relative clauses: working memory span and word order effects on RTs.
    Di Domenico A; Di Matteo R
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Oct; 136(4):387-406. PubMed ID: 19943612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proactive interference effects on sentence production.
    Ferreira VS; Firato CE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):795-800. PubMed ID: 12613685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading.
    Rayner K; Kambe G; Duffy SA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Nov; 53(4):1061-80. PubMed ID: 11131813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word associations are formed incidentally during sentential semantic integration.
    Prior A; Bentin S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jan; 127(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 17367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond sentence boundaries: grammatical gender information in short-term recall of texts.
    Schweppe J; Rummer R; Fürstenberg A
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 19103977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of word- and sentence-level contexts upon word recognition.
    Colombo L; Williams J
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Mar; 18(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 2319957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Processing complexity and sentence memory: evidence from amnesia.
    Shapiro LP; McNamara P; Zurif E; Lanzoni S; Cermak L
    Brain Lang; 1992 May; 42(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 1611467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses.
    Chen B; Ning A; Bi H; Dunlap S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18538740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye movements.
    Wiley J; Rayner K
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):1011-21. PubMed ID: 11105527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reinstatement of causal information during reading.
    Klin CM; Myers JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):554-60. PubMed ID: 8501430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The processing of cohesion devices in text comprehension.
    Ehrlich MF
    Psychol Res; 1991; 53(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 1946877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.