These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2927319)

  • 21. Preferences for different questions when testing hypotheses in an abstract task: positivity does play a role, asymmetry does not.
    Cherubini P; Rusconi P; Russo S; Di Bari S; Sacchi S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jun; 134(2):162-74. PubMed ID: 20223439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The elusive matching bias effect in the disjunctive selection task.
    Roberts MJ
    Exp Psychol; 2002; 49(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 12053535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hypothesis testing in a rule discovery problem: when a focused procedure is effective.
    Rossi S; Caverni JP; Girotto V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):263-7. PubMed ID: 11216318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Thinking within the box: The relational processing style elicited by counterfactual mind-sets.
    Kray LJ; Galinsky AD; Wong EM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Jul; 91(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 16834478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Concrete problems in the abstract deontic selection task - and how to solve them.
    Beller S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1414-29. PubMed ID: 22621364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inference using categories.
    Yamauchi T; Markman AB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 May; 26(3):776-95. PubMed ID: 10855431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reasoning versus text processing in the Wason selection task: a nondeontic perspective on perspective effects.
    Almor A; Sloman SA
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):1060-70. PubMed ID: 11105532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transfer of conditional reasoning: effects of explanations and initial problem types.
    Klaczynski PA; Gelfand H; Reese HW
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):208-20. PubMed ID: 2927318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The reliability of a hypothesis generation and testing task.
    Donnelly MB; Sisson JC; Woolliscroft JO
    Med Educ; 1990 Nov; 24(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 2266887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Individual differences in deductive reasoning.
    Newstead SE; Handley SJ; Harley C; Wright H; Farrelly D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jan; 57(1):33-60. PubMed ID: 14681003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An experimental study of strategy development.
    Newton EJ; Roberts MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):565-73. PubMed ID: 10946540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probabilistic reasoning in deluded, depressed and normal subjects: effects of task difficulty and meaningful versus non-meaningful material.
    Young HF; Bentall RP
    Psychol Med; 1997 Mar; 27(2):455-65. PubMed ID: 9089837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reasoning with conditionals containing negated constituents.
    Oaksford M; Stenning K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jul; 18(4):835-54. PubMed ID: 1385619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical reasoning in manual therapy.
    Jones MA
    Phys Ther; 1992 Dec; 72(12):875-84. PubMed ID: 1454863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Generation of hypotheses in Wason's 2-4-6 task: an information theory approach.
    Cherubini P; Castelvecchio E; Cherubini AM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Feb; 58(2):309-32. PubMed ID: 15903119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exploring how students think: a new method combining think-aloud and concept mapping protocols.
    Pottier P; Hardouin JB; Hodges BD; Pistorius MA; Connault J; Durant C; Clairand R; Sebille V; Barrier JH; Planchon B
    Med Educ; 2010 Sep; 44(9):926-935. PubMed ID: 20716103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Set-shifting and inhibition interplay affect the rule-matching bias occurrence during conditional reasoning task.
    Hashemi SFS; Khosrowabadi R; Karimi M
    J Med Life; 2022 Jun; 15(6):828-834. PubMed ID: 35928360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Children's difficulty with true belief tasks: Competence deficit or performance problem?
    Oktay-Gür N; Rakoczy H
    Cognition; 2017 Sep; 166():28-41. PubMed ID: 28554083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of explanation in simple binary decision tasks.
    Taylor EG; Landy DH; Ross BH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1361-75. PubMed ID: 22494344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Characteristics of fluent skills in a complex, dynamic problem-solving task.
    Sohn MH; Douglass SA; Chen MC; Anderson JR
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):742-52. PubMed ID: 16553063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.