333 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29273996)
1. Visitor Preferences for Visual Changes in Bark Beetle-Impacted Forest Recreation Settings in the United States and Germany.
Arnberger A; Ebenberger M; Schneider IE; Cottrell S; Schlueter AC; von Ruschkowski E; Venette RC; Snyder SA; Gobster PH
Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 61(2):209-223. PubMed ID: 29273996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The nature of the pandemic: Exploring the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic upon recreation visitor behaviors and experiences in parks and protected areas.
Ferguson MD; Lynch ML; Evensen D; Ferguson LA; Barcelona R; Giles G; Leberman M
J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100498. PubMed ID: 37521260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Large carbon release legacy from bark beetle outbreaks across Western United States.
Ghimire B; Williams CA; Collatz GJ; Vanderhoof M; Rogan J; Kulakowski D; Masek JG
Glob Chang Biol; 2015 Aug; 21(8):3087-101. PubMed ID: 25826244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial variability in tree regeneration after wildfire delays and dampens future bark beetle outbreaks.
Seidl R; Donato DC; Raffa KF; Turner MG
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(46):13075-13080. PubMed ID: 27821739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward the improvement of trail classification in national parks using the recreation opportunity spectrum approach.
Oishi Y
Environ Manage; 2013 Jun; 51(6):1126-36. PubMed ID: 23615956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do bark beetle outbreaks amplify or dampen future bark beetle disturbances in Central Europe?
Sommerfeld A; Rammer W; Heurich M; Hilmers T; Müller J; Seidl R
J Ecol; 2021 Feb; 109(2):737-749. PubMed ID: 33664526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using social media to estimate visitor provenance and patterns of recreation in Germany's national parks.
Sinclair M; Mayer M; Woltering M; Ghermandi A
J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 263():110418. PubMed ID: 32883482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.
Talal ML; Santelmann MV
Ecol Appl; 2020 Jun; 30(4):e02079. PubMed ID: 31972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Landscape development, forest fires, and wilderness management.
Wright HE
Science; 1974 Nov; 186(4163):487-95. PubMed ID: 17790369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Coupled Human-Environment Dynamics of Forest Pest Spread and Control in a Multi-Patch, Stochastic Setting.
Ali Q; Bauch CT; Anand M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0139353. PubMed ID: 26430902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Climatic and stand drivers of forest resistance to recent bark beetle disturbance in European coniferous forests.
Jaime L; Batllori E; Ferretti M; Lloret F
Glob Chang Biol; 2022 Apr; 28(8):2830-2841. PubMed ID: 35090075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What do we expect from forests? The European view of public demands.
Ciesielski M; Stereńczak K
J Environ Manage; 2018 Mar; 209():139-151. PubMed ID: 29289842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social-ecological approach.
D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 124():72-81. PubMed ID: 23624424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Park Visitors' Place Attachment and Climate Change-related Displacement: Potential Shifts in Who, Where, and When.
Perry EE; Xiao X; Nettles JM; Iretskaia TA; Manning RE
Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 68(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 33991206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of visitor use levels on visitor spatial behavior in off-trail areas of dispersed recreation use.
D'Antonio A; Monz C
J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 170():79-87. PubMed ID: 26803258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the Drivers of Visitor Loyalty in the Context of Outdoor Adventure Parks: The Case of Arsenal Park in Romania.
Moisescu OI; Gică OA; Dorobanțu MC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spatial configuration matters when removing windfelled trees to manage bark beetle disturbances in Central European forest landscapes.
Dobor L; Hlásny T; Rammer W; Zimová S; Barka I; Seidl R
J Environ Manage; 2020 Jan; 254():109792. PubMed ID: 31731030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative importance of climate and mountain pine beetle outbreaks on the occurrence of large wildfires in the western USA.
Mietkiewicz N; Kulakowski D
Ecol Appl; 2016 Dec; 26(8):2523-2535. PubMed ID: 27787956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Education and knowledge determine preference for bark beetle control measures in El Salvador.
Thorn S; Leverkus AB; Thorn CJ; Beudert B
J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():138-144. PubMed ID: 30471547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefits-based analysis of visitor use of Sorak-san National Park in Korea.
Shin WS; Jaakson R; Kim EI
Environ Manage; 2001 Sep; 28(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 11531242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
