These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29275089)

  • 1. A template for constructing Bayesian networks in forensic biology cases when considering activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():136-146. PubMed ID: 29275089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating forensic biology results given source level propositions.
    Taylor D; Abarno D; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():54-67. PubMed ID: 26720813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of forensic genetics findings given activity level propositions: A review.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Biedermann A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():34-49. PubMed ID: 29929059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of Bayesian networks in forensic soil casework.
    Uitdehaag SCA; Donders TH; Kuiper I; Wagner-Cremer F; Sjerps MJ
    Sci Justice; 2022 Mar; 62(2):229-238. PubMed ID: 35277237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions: Part I: evaluation of DNA profiling comparisons given (sub-) source propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():189-202. PubMed ID: 30041098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Bayesian networks to track DNA movement through complex transfer scenarios.
    Taylor D; Samie L; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():69-80. PubMed ID: 31234042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of Bayesian Networks and simulation methods to identify the variables impacting the value of evidence assessed under activity level propositions in stabbing cases.
    Samie L; Champod C; Taylor D; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102334. PubMed ID: 32563838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using case specific experiments to evaluate fingermarks on knives given activity level propositions.
    de Ronde A; Kokshoorn B; de Puit M; de Poot CJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Mar; 320():110710. PubMed ID: 33561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfer and persistence of non-self DNA on hands over time: Using empirical data to evaluate DNA evidence given activity level propositions.
    Szkuta B; Ballantyne KN; Kokshoorn B; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Mar; 33():84-97. PubMed ID: 29216581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oral intercourse or secondary transfer? A Bayesian approach of salivary amylase and foreign DNA findings.
    Breathnach M; Moore E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jun; 229(1-3):52-9. PubMed ID: 23683908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structuring cases into propositions, assumptions, and undisputed case information.
    Taylor D; Kokshoorn B; Hicks T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102199. PubMed ID: 31756630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of considering common sources of unknown DNA when evaluating findings given activity level propositions.
    Taylor D; Volgin L; Kokshoorn B; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102518. PubMed ID: 33865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks.
    Evett IW; Gill PD; Jackson G; Whitaker J; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 May; 47(3):520-30. PubMed ID: 12051330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Practical Guide for the Formulation of Propositions in the Bayesian Approach to DNA Evidence Interpretation in an Adversarial Environment.
    Gittelson S; Kalafut T; Myers S; Taylor D; Hicks T; Taroni F; Evett IW; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 26248867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A general approach to Bayesian networks for the interpretation of evidence.
    Taroni F; Biedermann A; Garbolino P; Aitken CG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Jan; 139(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14687767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis.
    Buckleton J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Evett I; Hicks T; Jackson G; Curran JM
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 25002042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resolving paternity relationships using X-chromosome STRs and Bayesian networks.
    Hatsch D; Keyser C; Hienne R; Bertrand L
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jul; 52(4):895-7. PubMed ID: 17553082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Probabilistically determining the cellular source of DNA derived from differential extractions in sexual assault scenarios.
    Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Sep; 24():124-135. PubMed ID: 27388428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.
    Hicks T; Biedermann A; de Koeijer JA; Taroni F; Champod C; Evett IW
    Sci Justice; 2015 Dec; 55(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 26654089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.