BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

551 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29275104)

  • 1. One-Step Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Dermal Matrix-Covered Implant Compared to Submuscular Implantation: Functional and Cost Evaluation.
    Cattelani L; Polotto S; Arcuri MF; Pedrazzi G; Linguadoca C; Bonati E
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Aug; 18(4):e703-e711. PubMed ID: 29275104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction.
    Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
    Reitsamer R; Peintinger F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early Functional Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Matched Cohort Study.
    Schaeffer CV; Dassoulas KR; Thuman J; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S399-S403. PubMed ID: 30570559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
    Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
    Dyrberg DL; Gunnarsson GL; Bille C; Sørensen JA; Thomsen JB
    Trials; 2020 Feb; 21(1):160. PubMed ID: 32041661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Safe Alternative to Submuscular Prosthetic Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Sbitany H; Piper M; Lentz R
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Sep; 140(3):432-443. PubMed ID: 28574950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
    Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
    Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.
    Wormer BA; Valmadrid AC; Ganesh Kumar N; Al Kassis S; Rankin TM; Kaoutzanis C; Higdon KK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Aug; 144(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 31348326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Staged Suprapectoral Expander/Implant Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Salibian AH; Harness JK; Mowlds DS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Jan; 139(1):30-39. PubMed ID: 28027223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective comparison study of early functional outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction: subpectoral versus prepectoral technique.
    Lee JS; Park E; Lee JH; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD; Jung TD
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Mar; 10(3):2520-2529. PubMed ID: 33691448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon dermal matrix: First multicenter European report on 100 cases.
    Vidya R; Masià J; Cawthorn S; Berna G; Bozza F; Gardetto A; Kołacińska A; Dell'Antonia F; Tiengo C; Bassetto F; Caputo GG; Governa M
    Breast J; 2017 Nov; 23(6):670-676. PubMed ID: 28481477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix.
    Belmonte BM; Campbell CA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decreased postoperative pain and opioid use following prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective cohort study: Pain after pre- versus subpectoral reconstruction.
    Bozzuto LM; Bartholomew AJ; Tung S; Sosin M; Tambar S; Cox S; Perez-Alvarez IM; King CA; Chan MC; Pittman TA; Tousimis EA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Aug; 74(8):1763-1769. PubMed ID: 33451949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix.
    Hong HK; Kim YH; Lee JS; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD
    BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):234. PubMed ID: 35718764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It.
    Salgarello M; Barone Adesi L; Macrì G; Visconti G
    Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1071-NP1077. PubMed ID: 37668406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review.
    Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.