578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29275949)
1. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Time limits during visual foraging reveal flexible working memory templates.
Kristjánsson T; Thornton IM; Kristjánsson Á
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jun; 44(6):827-835. PubMed ID: 29809049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?
Rajsic J; Woodman GF
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):269-279. PubMed ID: 30937674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
Foerster RM; Schneider WX
Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of working memory representations in the control of attention.
Woodman GF; Luck SJ; Schall JD
Cereb Cortex; 2007 Sep; 17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i118-24. PubMed ID: 17725994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can you have multiple attentional templates? Large-scale replications of Van Moorselaar, Theeuwes, and Olivers (2014) and Hollingworth and Beck (2016).
Frătescu M; Van Moorselaar D; Mathôt S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2700-2709. PubMed ID: 31309532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
Hollingworth A; Beck VM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.
Lorenc ES; Sreenivasan KK; Nee DE; Vandenbroucke ARE; D'Esposito M
J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(23):5267-5276. PubMed ID: 29739867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Looking sharp: Becoming a search template boosts precision and stability in visual working memory.
Rajsic J; Ouslis NE; Wilson DE; Pratt J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1643-1651. PubMed ID: 28537011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention.
Bahle B; Beck VM; Hollingworth A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):992-1011. PubMed ID: 29629781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.
Wolfe JM; Aizenman AM; Boettcher SE; Cain MS
Vision Res; 2016 Feb; 119():50-9. PubMed ID: 26731644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
Kerzel D; Witzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Finding memory in search: the effect of visual working memory load on visual search.
Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N; Pratt J; Ferber S
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1457-66. PubMed ID: 20603775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Posterior α EEG Dynamics Dissociate Current from Future Goals in Working Memory-Guided Visual Search.
de Vries IE; van Driel J; Olivers CN
J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(6):1591-1603. PubMed ID: 28069918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
