These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29276129)
1. Selection for Collective Aggressiveness Favors Social Susceptibility in Social Spiders. Pruitt JN; Wright CM; Lichtenstein JLL; Chism GT; McEwen BL; Kamath A; Pinter-Wollman N Curr Biol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):100-105.e4. PubMed ID: 29276129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild. Keiser CN; Pruitt JN Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1796):20141424. PubMed ID: 25320170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Collective aggressiveness limits colony persistence in high- but not low-elevation sites at Amazonian social spiders. Lichtenstein JLL; Fisher DN; McEwen BL; Nondorf DT; Calvache E; Schmitz C; Elässer J; Pruitt JN J Evol Biol; 2019 Dec; 32(12):1362-1367. PubMed ID: 31464022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Warring arthropod societies: Social spider colonies can delay annihilation by predatory ants via reduced apparency and increased group size. Keiser CN; Wright CM; Pruitt JN Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():14-21. PubMed ID: 26205161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group. Pruitt JN Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Sep; 282(1814):. PubMed ID: 26336171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Personality composition alters the transmission of cuticular bacteria in social groups. Keiser CN; Howell KA; Pinter-Wollman N; Pruitt JN Biol Lett; 2016 Jul; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 27381885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Similar patterns of frequency-dependent selection on animal personalities emerge in three species of social spiders. Lichtenstein JL; Pruitt JN J Evol Biol; 2015 Jun; 28(6):1248-56. PubMed ID: 25940218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Population history in social spiders repeated: colony structure and lineage evolution in Stegodyphus mimosarum (Eresidae). Johannesen J; Wickler W; Seibt U; Moritz RF Mol Ecol; 2009 Jul; 18(13):2812-8. PubMed ID: 19500247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders. Hunt ER; Mi B; Fernandez C; Wong BM; Pruitt JN; Pinter-Wollman N Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1886):. PubMed ID: 30185649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions. Pruitt JN; Goodnight CJ Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7522):359-62. PubMed ID: 25274310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Could relatedness help explain why individuals lead in bottlenose dolphin groups? Lewis JS; Wartzok D; Heithaus M; Krützen M PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58162. PubMed ID: 23516445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Iterative evolution of increased behavioral variation characterizes the transition to sociality in spiders and proves advantageous. Pruitt JN; Oufiero CE; Avilés L; Riechert SE Am Nat; 2012 Oct; 180(4):496-510. PubMed ID: 22976012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Individual and Group Performance Suffers from Social Niche Disruption. Laskowski KL; Montiglio PO; Pruitt JN Am Nat; 2016 Jun; 187(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 27172596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Leaders benefit followers in the collective movement of a social sawfly. Hodgkin LK; Symonds MR; Elgar MA Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1796):20141700. PubMed ID: 25320163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence for loss of nepotism in the evolution of permanent sociality. Berger-Tal R; Lubin Y; Settepani V; Majer M; Bilde T; Tuni C Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():13284. PubMed ID: 26333675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evolution of leader-follower reciprocity: the theory of service-for-prestige. Price ME; Van Vugt M Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():363. PubMed ID: 24926244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider. Grinsted L; Pruitt JN; Settepani V; Bilde T Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Sep; 280(1767):20131407. PubMed ID: 23902907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Good for the group? Explaining apparent group-level adaptation. Smallegange IM; Egas M Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 Jul; 30(7):379-81. PubMed ID: 25913450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations. Wang G; Van Iddekinge CH; Zhang L; Bishoff J J Appl Psychol; 2019 Jan; 104(1):70-106. PubMed ID: 30265017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]