These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29276371)

  • 1. Normal Theory Two-Stage ML Estimator When Data Are Missing at the Item Level.
    Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    J Educ Behav Stat; 2017 Aug; 42(4):405-431. PubMed ID: 29276371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-stage maximum likelihood approach for item-level missing data in regression.
    Chen L; Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2306-2323. PubMed ID: 32333330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Normal Theory GLS Estimator for Missing Data: An Application to Item-Level Missing Data and a Comparison to Two-Stage ML.
    Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():767. PubMed ID: 28588523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missing data in a multi-item instrument were best handled by multiple imputation at the item score level.
    Eekhout I; de Vet HC; Twisk JW; Brand JP; de Boer MR; Heymans MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Mar; 67(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 24291505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simple imputation methods versus direct likelihood analysis for missing item scores in multilevel educational data.
    Kadengye DT; Cools W; Ceulemans E; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):516-31. PubMed ID: 22002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple imputation as a flexible tool for missing data handling in clinical research.
    Enders CK
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Nov; 98():4-18. PubMed ID: 27890222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of multiple imputation strategies to deal with missing nonnormal data in structural equation modeling.
    Jia F; Wu W
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):3100-3119. PubMed ID: 36038813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Passive imputation and parcel summaries are both valid to handle missing items in studies with many multi-item scales.
    Eekhout I; de Vet HC; de Boer MR; Twisk JW; Heymans MW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1128-1140. PubMed ID: 27334917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of multiple imputation strategies for handling missing data in multi-item scales: Guidance for longitudinal studies.
    Mainzer R; Apajee J; Nguyen CD; Carlin JB; Lee KJ
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(21):4660-4674. PubMed ID: 34102709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Including auxiliary item information in longitudinal data analyses improved handling missing questionnaire outcome data.
    Eekhout I; Enders CK; Twisk JW; de Boer MR; de Vet HC; Heymans MW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):637-45. PubMed ID: 25724894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple imputation for patient reported outcome measures in randomised controlled trials: advantages and disadvantages of imputing at the item, subscale or composite score level.
    Rombach I; Gray AM; Jenkinson C; Murray DW; Rivero-Arias O
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Aug; 18(1):87. PubMed ID: 30153796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining proration and full information maximum likelihood in handling missing data in Likert scale items: A hybrid approach.
    Wu W; Gu F; Fukui S
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Apr; 54(2):922-940. PubMed ID: 34357540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing Alternative Imputation Strategies for Infrequently Missing Items on Multi-item Scales.
    Rezvan PH; Comulada WS; Fernández MI; Belin TR
    Commun Stat Case Stud Data Anal Appl; 2022; 8(4):682-713. PubMed ID: 36467970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A factored regression model for composite scores with item-level missing data.
    Alacam E; Enders CK; Du H; Keller BT
    Psychol Methods; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37227897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Addressing Item-Level Missing Data: A Comparison of Proration and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
    Mazza GL; Enders CK; Ruehlman LS
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):504-19. PubMed ID: 26610249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Latent Variable Interactions With Incomplete Indicators.
    Cham H; Reshetnyak E; Rosenfeld B; Breitbart W
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(1):12-30. PubMed ID: 27834491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data.
    Lee T; Shi D
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):466-485. PubMed ID: 33507765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using Structural Equation Modeling to Examine the Influence of Social, Behavioral, and Nutritional Variables on Health Outcomes Based on NHANES Data: Addressing Complex Design, Nonnormally Distributed Variables, and Missing Information.
    Hartwell ML; Khojasteh J; Wetherill MS; Croff JM; Wheeler D
    Curr Dev Nutr; 2019 May; 3(5):nzz010. PubMed ID: 31008441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Performances of Missing Data Handling Methods in Ability Estimation From Sparse Data.
    Xiao J; Bulut O
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Oct; 80(5):932-954. PubMed ID: 32855565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the Effects of Missing Data Handling Methods on Scale Linking Accuracy.
    Wu T; Kim SY; Westine C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Dec; 83(6):1202-1228. PubMed ID: 37974655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.