212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29277483)
1. Superior Reproducibility of the Leading to Leading Edge and Inner to Inner Edge Methods in the Ultrasound Assessment of Maximum Abdominal Aortic Diameter.
Borgbjerg J; Bøgsted M; Lindholt JS; Behr-Rasmussen C; Hørlyck A; Frøkjær JB
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2018 Feb; 55(2):206-213. PubMed ID: 29277483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound measurement for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening: a direct comparison of the three leading methods.
Chiu KW; Ling L; Tripathi V; Ahmed M; Shrivastava V
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Apr; 47(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 24491283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameters: A Study on the Discrepancy between Inner to Inner and Outer to Outer Measurements.
Meecham L; Evans R; Buxton P; Allingham K; Hughes M; Rajagopalan S; Fairhead J; Asquith JR; Pherwani AD
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Jan; 49(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 25453235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of three ultrasound methods of measuring the diameter of the abdominal aorta.
Gürtelschmid M; Björck M; Wanhainen A
Br J Surg; 2014 May; 101(6):633-6. PubMed ID: 24723017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasound measurement of aortic diameter in a national screening programme.
Hartshorne TC; McCollum CN; Earnshaw JJ; Morris J; Nasim A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2011 Aug; 42(2):195-9. PubMed ID: 21439859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reproducibility of measuring maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter from ultrasound images.
Matthews EO; Pinchbeck J; Elmore K; Jones RE; Moxon JV; Golledge J
Ultrasound J; 2021 Feb; 13(1):13. PubMed ID: 33646456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Editor's Choice - Comparison of the Reproducibility of Ultrasound Calliper Placement Methods in Abdominal Aortic Diameter Measurements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies.
Bissacco D; Mandigers TJ; Savaré L; Domanin M; D'Oria M; Ieva F; Van Herwaarden JA; Mani K; Wanhainen A; Trimarchi S
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2023 Nov; 66(5):620-631. PubMed ID: 37331424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Agreement between Nurses in the Ultrasound Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Diameter within a National Screening Programme.
Crilly MA; Mundie A; Bachoo P; Bruce P; Colvin FA; Geddes WA; Smart HE
Ann Vasc Surg; 2016 May; 33():194-201. PubMed ID: 26902935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysm by angio-CT: reproducibility is better with the semi-automated method.
Mora C; Marcus C; Barbe C; Ecarnot F; Long A
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Feb; 47(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 24268793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT angiography in stent-graft sizing: impact of using inner vs. outer wall measurements of aortic neck diameters.
Iezzi R; Dattesi R; Pirro F; Nestola M; Santoro M; Snider F; Bonomo L
J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Jun; 18(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 21679062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved reliability of ultrasonic surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Länne T; Sandgren T; Mangell P; Sonesson B; Hansen F
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1997 Feb; 13(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 9091147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Bredahl K; Sandholt B; Lönn L; Rouet L; Ardon R; Eiberg JP; Sillesen H
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 49(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 25662155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abdominal aortic diameter is increased in males with a family history of abdominal aortic aneurysms: results from the Danish VIVA-trial.
Joergensen TM; Houlind K; Green A; Lindholt JS
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2014 Dec; 48(6):669-75. PubMed ID: 25443525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation.
Diehm N; Baumgartner I; Silvestro A; Herrmann P; Triller J; Schmidli J; Do DD; Dinkel HP
Vasa; 2005 Nov; 34(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16363281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Lindholt JS; Vammen S; Juul S; Henneberg EW; Fasting H
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Jun; 17(6):472-5. PubMed ID: 10375481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring abdominal aortic diameters in routine abdominal computed tomography scans and implications for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening.
Claridge R; Arnold S; Morrison N; van Rij AM
J Vasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 65(6):1637-1642. PubMed ID: 28216357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. When the diameter of the abdominal aorta should be considered as abnormal? A new ultrasonographic index using the wrist circumference as a body build reference.
Sconfienza LM; Santagostino I; Di Leo G; Piazza R; Gozzi G; Trimarchi S; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e532-6. PubMed ID: 23849990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Infra-renal abdominal aortic calcification volume does not predict small abdominal aortic aneurysm growth.
Hendy K; Gunnarsson R; Cronin O; Golledge J
Atherosclerosis; 2015 Nov; 243(1):334-8. PubMed ID: 26433350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group.
Lederle FA; Wilson SE; Johnson GR; Reinke DB; Littooy FN; Acher CW; Messina LM; Ballard DJ; Ansel HJ
J Vasc Surg; 1995 Jun; 21(6):945-52. PubMed ID: 7776474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm and large infrarenal aorta in patients with acute coronary syndrome and proven coronary stenosis: a prospective monocenter study.
Long A; Bui HT; Barbe C; Henni AH; Journet J; Metz D; Nazeyrollas P
Ann Vasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 24(5):602-8. PubMed ID: 20371161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
