These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29277603)

  • 1. Comparing evolutionary distances via adaptive distance functions.
    Damti Y; Gronau I; Moran S; Yavneh I
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Mar; 440():88-99. PubMed ID: 29277603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive distance measures for resolving K2P quartets: metric separation versus stochastic noise.
    Gronau I; Moran S; Yavneh I
    J Comput Biol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):1509-18. PubMed ID: 20575667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward extracting all phylogenetic information from matrices of evolutionary distances.
    Roch S
    Science; 2010 Mar; 327(5971):1376-9. PubMed ID: 20223986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards optimal distance functions for stochastic substitution models.
    Gronau I; Moran S; Yavneh I
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 19501101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic Tree Estimation With and Without Alignment: New Distance Methods and Benchmarking.
    Bogusz M; Whelan S
    Syst Biol; 2017 Mar; 66(2):218-231. PubMed ID: 27633353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phylogenetic inference with weighted codon evolutionary distances.
    Criscuolo A; Michel CJ
    J Mol Evol; 2009 Apr; 68(4):377-92. PubMed ID: 19308635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy guarantees for phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on balanced minimum evolution.
    Bordewich M; Mihaescu R
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 24091392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phylogeny reconstruction: increasing the accuracy of pairwise distance estimation using Bayesian inference of evolutionary rates.
    Ninio M; Privman E; Pupko T; Friedman N
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(2):e136-41. PubMed ID: 17237082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome BLAST distance phylogenies inferred from whole plastid and whole mitochondrion genome sequences.
    Auch AF; Henz SR; Holland BR; Göker M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jul; 7():350. PubMed ID: 16854218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phylogenetic trees based on gene content.
    Huson DH; Steel M
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 20(13):2044-9. PubMed ID: 15044248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors affecting the errors in the estimation of evolutionary distances between sequences.
    Hoyle DC; Higgs PG
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12519899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance comparison between k-tuple distance and four model-based distances in phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Yang K; Zhang L
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Mar; 36(5):e33. PubMed ID: 18296485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficient biased estimation of evolutionary distances when substitution rates vary across sites.
    Guindon S; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Apr; 19(4):534-43. PubMed ID: 11919295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast computation of distance estimators.
    Elias I; Lagergren J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 8():89. PubMed ID: 17355623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximum likelihood estimates of pairwise rearrangement distances.
    Serdoz S; Egri-Nagy A; Sumner J; Holland BR; Jarvis PD; Tanaka MM; Francis AR
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Jun; 423():31-40. PubMed ID: 28435014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A stochastic local search algorithm for distance-based phylogeny reconstruction.
    Tria F; Caglioti E; Loreto V; Pagnani A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Nov; 27(11):2587-95. PubMed ID: 20562341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is multiple-sequence alignment required for accurate inference of phylogeny?
    Höhl M; Ragan MA
    Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):206-21. PubMed ID: 17454975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quartet-based phylogenetic inference: improvements and limits.
    Ranwez V; Gascuel O
    Mol Biol Evol; 2001 Jun; 18(6):1103-16. PubMed ID: 11371598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.