These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2927791)

  • 1. Standards for qualitative research.
    Burns N
    Nurs Sci Q; 1989; 2(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 2927791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodological aspects of rigor in qualitative nursing research on families involved in intensive care units: a literature review.
    Høye S; Severinsson E
    Nurs Health Sci; 2007 Mar; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 17300547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rigor in cross-cultural nursing research.
    Im EO; Page R; Lin LC; Tsai HM; Cheng CY
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Nov; 41(8):891-9. PubMed ID: 15476762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship of education and moral reasoning to ethical practice: a meta-analysis of quantitative studies.
    Ketefian S
    Sch Inq Nurs Pract; 2001; 15(1):3-18; discussion 19-23. PubMed ID: 11569300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rigour and grounded theory.
    Cooney A
    Nurse Res; 2011; 18(4):17-22. PubMed ID: 21853888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of qualitative research.
    Horsburgh D
    J Clin Nurs; 2003 Mar; 12(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 12603565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The interplay between the abstract and the particular: research ethics standards and the practice of research as symbolic.
    Peter E
    Nurs Sci Q; 2006 Jan; 19(1):20-4; discussion 19. PubMed ID: 16407595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Substruction: improving the linkage from theory to method.
    Dulock HL; Holzemer WL
    Nurs Sci Q; 1991; 4(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 2034421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Complexity of professional actions, qualitative research and evaluation, reliance and legitimacy. The case of research and formation of nurses].
    Clenet J
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2009 Mar; (96):19-26. PubMed ID: 19388409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The myth of induction in qualitative nursing research.
    Bergdahl E; Berterö CM
    Nurs Philos; 2015 Apr; 16(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 25413613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orem's self-care deficit nursing theory: its philosophic foundation and the state of the science.
    Taylor SG; Geden E; Isaramalai S; Wongvatunyu S
    Nurs Sci Q; 2000 Apr; 13(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 11847693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ethical standards for nurse researchers. SA Society for Nursing Researchers (SASNR).
    Curationis; 1996 Mar; 19(1):74-5. PubMed ID: 9257584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The MIXED framework: A novel approach to evaluating mixed-methods rigor.
    Eckhardt AL; DeVon HA
    Nurs Inq; 2017 Oct; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 28181365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Qualitative investigation: zeal for rigor and ethics.
    Boemer MR; Correa AK
    Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2006 Sep; 40(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 17094313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethical codes and policy standards affecting health care practice and research: a bibliography.
    Silva MC
    Plast Surg Nurs; 1995; 15(1):52. PubMed ID: 7777630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Qualitative research: the evaluation of its credibility, fittingness, and auditability.
    Beck CT
    West J Nurs Res; 1993 Apr; 15(2):263-6. PubMed ID: 8470379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How factual do we want the facts? Criteria for a critical appraisal of empirical research for use in ethics.
    Strech D
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):222-5. PubMed ID: 20338933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research.
    Rolfe G
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Feb; 53(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 16441535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.