256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29278461)
1. Implementing The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology results in a decrease in the rate of the "atypical" category and an increase in its prediction of subsequent high-grade urothelial carcinoma.
Wang Y; Auger M; Kanber Y; Caglar D; Brimo F
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Mar; 126(3):207-214. PubMed ID: 29278461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of Implementing the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology in the Performance of Urine Cytology: A Correlative Study of 124 Cases.
Hassan M; Solanki S; Kassouf W; Kanber Y; Caglar D; Auger M; Brimo F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 146(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 27543983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology with histologic follow-up.
Rohra P; Ocampo Gonzalez FA; Yan L; Mir F; Furlan K; Basu S; Barua A; Cheng L; Park JW
Diagn Cytopathol; 2021 Jun; 49(6):691-699. PubMed ID: 33600080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An institutional experience with The Paris System: A paradigm shift from ambiguous terminology to more objective criteria for reporting urine cytology.
Roy M; Kaushal S; Jain D; Seth A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR
Cytopathology; 2017 Dec; 28(6):509-515. PubMed ID: 28833848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category.
Celik B; Kavas G
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 36731438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytologic evaluation of upper urinary tract specimens: An institutional retrospective study using The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology second edition with histopathologic follow-up.
Khajir G; Sun T; Wang H; Sprenkle PC; Adeniran AJ; Cai G; Levi AW
Cytopathology; 2024 Mar; 35(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 37916579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Paris System for urine cytology in upper tract urothelial specimens: A comparative analysis with biopsy and surgical resection.
Zheng X; Si Q; Du D; Harshan M; Zhang Z; Haines K; Shi W; Chhieng DC
Cytopathology; 2018 Apr; 29(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 29251368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Split-sample comparison of urothelial cells in ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in urinary cytology: Do we need to adjust The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology criteria?
Richardson CJ; Pambuccian SE; Barkan GA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 31774630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementation of The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology improves diagnostic accuracy of selective upper urinary tract cytology.
Miyai K; Nakayama M; Minabe S; Ogata S; Ito K; Matsukuma S
Cancer Cytopathol; 2024 Apr; 132(4):242-249. PubMed ID: 38294961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Implementation and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Paris Classification for Reporting Urinary Cytology in Voided Urine Specimens: A Cyto-Histological Correlation Study in a Cancer Center.
Lobo J; Lobo C; Leça L; Rodrigues Â; Henrique R; Monteiro P
Pathobiology; 2023; 90(4):233-240. PubMed ID: 36574757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of the Paris Reporting System for Urine Cytology: The Three-Year Experience of a Single Tertiary Care Institute in Thailand.
Phruttinarakorn B; Plumworasawat S; Kayankarnnavee J; Lualon J; Pongtippan A
Acta Cytol; 2022; 66(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 34999581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value of 0.5 for atypical urothelial cells.
Hang JF; Charu V; Zhang ML; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Sep; 125(9):710-716. PubMed ID: 28581671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One year of experience using the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Meilleroux J; Daniel G; Aziza J; d'Aure DM; Quintyn-Ranty ML; Basset CM; Evrard SM; Courtade-Saidi MM
Cancer Cytopathol; 2018 Jun; 126(6):430-436. PubMed ID: 29663682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology improves the negative predictive value of high-grade urothelial carcinoma.
Yamasaki M; Taoka R; Katakura K; Matsunaga T; Kani N; Honda T; Harada S; Tohi Y; Matsuoka Y; Kato T; Okazoe H; Tsunemori H; Ueda N; Haba R; Sugimoto M
BMC Urol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):51. PubMed ID: 35382830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. p16/Ki-67 dual labeling and urinary cytology results according to the New Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: Impact of extended follow-up.
Piaton E; Advenier AS; Carré C; Decaussin-Petrucci M; Mège-Lechevallier F; Hutin K; Nennig C; Colombel M; Ruffion A
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Jul; 125(7):552-562. PubMed ID: 28371465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved risk stratification for patients with high-grade urothelial carcinoma following application of the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology.
Cowan ML; Rosenthal DL; VandenBussche CJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2017 Jun; 125(6):427-434. PubMed ID: 28272842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant reduction of indeterminate (atypical) diagnosis after implementation of The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A single-institution study of more than 27,000 cases.
Tian W; Shore KT; Shah RB
Cancer Cytopathol; 2021 Feb; 129(2):114-120. PubMed ID: 32931158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cyto-histo correlation and false-negative urine: Before and after the Paris system for reporting urinary cytology.
Yuan L; Gero M; Zia S; Aryal SC; Shetty S; Reynolds JP
Diagn Cytopathol; 2022 Aug; 50(8):404-410. PubMed ID: 35652594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology in daily practice with emphasis on ancillary testing by multiprobe FISH.
Vlajnic T; Gut A; Savic S; Bubendorf L
J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 73(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 31467041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methylation study of the Paris system for reporting urinary (TPS) categories.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Fiorentino V; Sacco E; Bientinesi R; Pugliese D; Iacovelli R; Schinzari G; Larocca LM; Bassi PF
J Clin Pathol; 2021 Feb; 74(2):102-105. PubMed ID: 32527754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
