205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29279171)
1. Support Vector Machines (SVM) classification of prostate cancer Gleason score in central gland using multiparametric magnetic resonance images: A cross-validated study.
Li J; Weng Z; Xu H; Zhang Z; Miao H; Chen W; Liu Z; Zhang X; Wang M; Xu X; Ye Q
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():61-67. PubMed ID: 29279171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The performance of intravoxel-incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging derived hypoxia for the risk stratification of prostate cancer in peripheral zone.
Chen Z; Xue Y; Zhang Z; Li W; Wen M; Zhao Y; Li J; Weng Z; Ye Q
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108865. PubMed ID: 32058895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative Analysis of Prostate Multiparametric MR Images for Detection of Aggressive Prostate Cancer in the Peripheral Zone: A Multiple Imager Study.
Hoang Dinh A; Melodelima C; Souchon R; Lehaire J; Bratan F; Mège-Lechevallier F; Ruffion A; Crouzet S; Colombel M; Rouvière O
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 26859255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer.
Wang Q; Li H; Yan X; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB; Zhang YD
Urol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):337.e15-24. PubMed ID: 26048104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Final Gleason score prediction using discriminant analysis and support vector machine based on preoperative multiparametric MR imaging of prostate cancer at 3T.
Citak-Er F; Vural M; Acar O; Esen T; Onay A; Ozturk-Isik E
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():690787. PubMed ID: 25544944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiomics Features Measured with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.
Hectors SJ; Cherny M; Yadav KK; Beksaç AT; Thulasidass H; Lewis S; Davicioni E; Wang P; Tewari AK; Taouli B
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 30958743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images for prostate cancer detection and aggressiveness assessment: a cross-imager study.
Peng Y; Jiang Y; Antic T; Giger ML; Eggener SE; Oto A
Radiology; 2014 May; 271(2):461-71. PubMed ID: 24533870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting prostate tumour location from multiparametric MRI using Gaussian kernel support vector machines: a preliminary study.
Sun Y; Reynolds H; Wraith D; Williams S; Finnegan ME; Mitchell C; Murphy D; Ebert MA; Haworth A
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2017 Mar; 40(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 28120144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stratification of the aggressiveness of prostate cancer using pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI).
Dwivedi DK; Kumar R; Bora GS; Thulkar S; Sharma S; Gupta SD; Jagannathan NR
NMR Biomed; 2016 Mar; 29(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 26730884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic stratification of prostate tumour aggressiveness using multiparametric MRI: a horizontal comparison of texture features.
Sun Y; Reynolds HM; Wraith D; Williams S; Finnegan ME; Mitchell C; Murphy D; Haworth A
Acta Oncol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):1118-1126. PubMed ID: 30994052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate cancer: correlation of intravoxel incoherent motion MR parameters with Gleason score.
Yang DM; Kim HC; Kim SW; Jahng GH; Won KY; Lim SJ; Oh JH
Clin Imaging; 2016; 40(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 27133684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer.
Kato S; Kamijima S; Inaoka T; Kamiya N; Sasai D; Terada H; Hiruta N; Suzuki H
Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 29939084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using support vector machine analysis to assess PartinMR: A new prediction model for organ-confined prostate cancer.
Wang J; Wu CJ; Bao ML; Zhang J; Shi HB; Zhang YD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 29437268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of machine learning algorithms to predict clinically significant prostate cancer of the peripheral zone with multiparametric MRI using clinical assessment categories and radiomic features.
Bernatz S; Ackermann J; Mandel P; Kaltenbach B; Zhdanovich Y; Harter PN; Döring C; Hammerstingl R; Bodelle B; Smith K; Bucher A; Albrecht M; Rosbach N; Basten L; Yel I; Wenzel M; Bankov K; Koch I; Chun FK; Köllermann J; Wild PJ; Vogl TJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6757-6769. PubMed ID: 32676784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Discriminating Low-Grade From High-Grade Prostate Cancer.
Vos EK; Kobus T; Litjens GJ; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO; Maas MC; Scheenen TW
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):490-7. PubMed ID: 25867656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.
Moldovan PC; Van den Broeck T; Sylvester R; Marconi L; Bellmunt J; van den Bergh RCN; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; van der Kwast TH; Matveev VB; van der Poel HG; De Santis M; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Yuan CY; Cornford P; Mottet N; Lam TB; Rouvière O
Eur Urol; 2017 Aug; 72(2):250-266. PubMed ID: 28336078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
