241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29279525)
1. Planimetry of the Orifice Area in Aortic Valve Stenosis Using Phase-Contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Abe H; Iguchi N; Utanohara Y; Takada K; Hen Y; Machida H; Takeda N; Sumiyoshi T
Int Heart J; 2018 Jan; 59(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 29279525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses.
von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Rudolph A; Wassmuth R; Bohl S; Buschmann EE; Abdel-Aty H; Dietz R; Schulz-Menger J
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Sep; 2(5):397-404, 2 p following 404. PubMed ID: 19808628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation.
Reant P; Lederlin M; Lafitte S; Serri K; Montaudon M; Corneloup O; Roudaut R; Laurent F
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):276-83. PubMed ID: 16873006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of aortic valve area at 256-slice computed tomography: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac catheterization in subjects with high-grade aortic valve stenosis prior to percutaneous valve replacement.
Klass O; Walker MJ; Olszewski ME; Bahner J; Feuerlein S; Hoffmann MH; Lang A
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Oct; 80(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 20832221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
Levy F; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Hugues N; Alexandrescu C; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic valve area, stroke volume, left ventricular hypertrophy, remodeling, and fibrosis in aortic stenosis assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between high and low gradient and normal and low flow aortic stenosis.
Barone-Rochette G; Piérard S; Seldrum S; de Meester de Ravenstein C; Melchior J; Maes F; Pouleur AC; Vancraeynest D; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(6):1009-17. PubMed ID: 24100045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of accuracy of aortic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in biplane mode versus two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
Blot-Souletie N; Hébrard A; Acar P; Carrié D; Puel J
Echocardiography; 2007 Nov; 24(10):1065-72. PubMed ID: 18001360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography for assessment of aortic valve area in aortic valve stenosis.
Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Buck T; Erbel R
Herz; 2006 Oct; 31(7):650-7. PubMed ID: 17072778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grading of aortic stenosis severity: a head-to-head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.
Mantini C; Di Giammarco G; Pizzicannella J; Gallina S; Ricci F; D'Ugo E; Marchetti M; Cotroneo AR; Ahmed N; Bucciarelli-Ducci C; Tartaro A; De Caterina R
Radiol Med; 2018 Sep; 123(9):643-654. PubMed ID: 29730841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards?
John AS; Dill T; Brandt RR; Rau M; Ricken W; Bachmann G; Hamm CW
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2003 Aug; 42(3):519-26. PubMed ID: 12906983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated and Manual Measurements of the Aortic Annulus with ECG-Gated Cardiac CT Angiography Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Comparison with 3D-Transesophageal Echocardiography.
Guez D; Boroumand G; Ruggiero NJ; Mehrotra P; Halpern EJ
Acad Radiol; 2017 May; 24(5):587-593. PubMed ID: 28130049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of aortic valve area: comparison of different methods of echocardiography with 3-D scan of the excised valve.
Shirazi S; Golmohammadi F; Tavoosi A; Salehi M; Larti F; Sardari A; Geraiely B; Rahmanian M; Saberi K; Sattarzadeh Badkoubeh R
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Feb; 37(2):529-538. PubMed ID: 33001325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging of aortic valve stenosis and aortic root to multimodality imaging for selection of transcatheter aortic valve implantation candidates.
Paelinck BP; Van Herck PL; Rodrigus I; Claeys MJ; Laborde JC; Parizel PM; Vrints CJ; Bosmans JM
Am J Cardiol; 2011 Jul; 108(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 21529729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.
Kupfahl C; Honold M; Meinhardt G; Vogelsberg H; Wagner A; Mahrholdt H; Sechtem U
Heart; 2004 Aug; 90(8):893-901. PubMed ID: 15253962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
