These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29279982)

  • 1. Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Macnamara A; Keage HAD; Loetscher T
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Feb; 236(2):335-346. PubMed ID: 29279982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Instructional Dependency of SNARC Effects Reveals Flexibility of the Space-Magnitude Association of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Magnitudes.
    Lee D; Chun J; Cho S
    Perception; 2016 May; 45(5):552-67. PubMed ID: 27151510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).
    Patro K; Shaki S
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 26714804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.
    Fattorini E; Pinto M; Merola S; D'Onofrio M; Doricchi F
    Prog Brain Res; 2016; 227():223-56. PubMed ID: 27339014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bad-good constraints on a polarity correspondence account for the spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and markedness association of response codes (MARC) effects.
    Leth-Steensen C; Citta R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(3):482-94. PubMed ID: 26213330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments.
    Bae GY; Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1506-21. PubMed ID: 19857020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing implicit and synaesthetic number-space associations: Visuospatial and verbal spatial-numerical associations of response codes.
    Jonas CN; Spiller MJ; Jansari A; Ward J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1262-73. PubMed ID: 24228728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.
    Lopiccolo D; Chang CB
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261146. PubMed ID: 34914756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.
    Pinto M; Pellegrino M; Lasaponara S; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102887. PubMed ID: 31351325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple left-to-right spatial representations of number magnitudes? Evidence from left spatial neglect.
    van Dijck JP; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1031-1043. PubMed ID: 30739136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Faulty Magnitude Detector: Why SNARC-Like Tasks Cannot Support a Generalized Magnitude System.
    Casasanto D; Pitt B
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Oct; 43(10):e12794. PubMed ID: 31621122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automaticity of access to numerical magnitude and its spatial associations: The role of task and number representation.
    Cleland AA; Bull R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):333-348. PubMed ID: 29708369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit response-irrelevant number information triggers the SNARC effect: evidence using a neural overlap paradigm.
    Mitchell T; Bull R; Cleland AA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1945-61. PubMed ID: 22524699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect.
    Viarouge A; Hubbard EM; Dehaene S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(8):1484-99. PubMed ID: 24571534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Repetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
    Tan S; Dixon P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2011 Jun; 65(2):84-97. PubMed ID: 21668090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).
    Pellegrino M; Pinto M; Marson F; Lasaponara S; Rossi-Arnaud C; Cestari V; Doricchi F
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 237(10):2633-2643. PubMed ID: 31384968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple spatial mappings in numerical cognition.
    Shaki S; Fischer MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):804-9. PubMed ID: 22428673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SNARC (spatial-numerical association of response codes) meets SPARC (spatial-pitch association of response codes): Automaticity and interdependency in compatibility effects.
    Weis T; Estner B; van Leeuwen C; Lachmann T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(7):1366-83. PubMed ID: 26274895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cognitive mechanisms of the SNARC effect: an individual differences approach.
    Viarouge A; Hubbard EM; McCandliss BD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95756. PubMed ID: 24760048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The SNARC effect in two dimensions: Evidence for a frontoparallel mental number plane.
    Hesse PN; Bremmer F
    Vision Res; 2017 Jan; 130():85-96. PubMed ID: 27836333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.