These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29280032)

  • 21. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Age of acquisition estimates for 1,208 ambiguous and polysemous words.
    Khanna MM; Cortese MJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Mar; 43(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 21287120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.
    Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lexical access and selection of contextually appropriate meaning for ambiguous words.
    Ihara A; Hayakawa T; Wei Q; Munetsuna S; Fujimaki N
    Neuroimage; 2007 Nov; 38(3):576-88. PubMed ID: 17888689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Listeners and readers generalize their experience with word meanings across modalities.
    Gilbert RA; Davis MH; Gaskell MG; Rodd JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1533-1561. PubMed ID: 29389181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What is semantic diversity and why does it facilitate visual word recognition?
    Cevoli B; Watkins C; Rastle K
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):247-263. PubMed ID: 32666392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Brain representations of lexical ambiguity: Disentangling homonymy, polysemy, and their meanings.
    Liang X; Huang F; Liu D; Xu M
    Brain Lang; 2024 Jun; 253():105426. PubMed ID: 38815503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Morpho-semantic processing in word recognition: evidence from balanced and biased ambiguous morphemes.
    Tsang YK; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1990-2001. PubMed ID: 23834058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.
    Jager B; Cleland AA
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.
    Robert C; Rico Duarte L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Apr; 45(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 25680348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Probing Lexical Ambiguity in Chinese Characters via Their Word Formations: Convergence of Perceived and Computed Metrics.
    Wang T; Xu X; Xie X; Ng ML
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Nov; 47(11):e13379. PubMed ID: 37988245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.
    Folk JR; Morris RK
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Jan; 31(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 12699146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic transparency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition.
    Smolka E; Eulitz C
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1540-1562. PubMed ID: 29916042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
    MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The influence of semantic richness on the visual recognition of emotional words].
    Syssau A; Laxén J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Mar; 66(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 22390477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Number of Meanings and Number of Senses: An ERP Study of Sublexical Ambiguities in Reading Chinese Disyllabic Compounds.
    Huang HW; Lee CY
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():324. PubMed ID: 29651260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access.
    Rodd JM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):411-427. PubMed ID: 31961780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Not all ambiguous words are created equal: an EEG investigation of homonymy and polysemy.
    Klepousniotou E; Pike GB; Steinhauer K; Gracco V
    Brain Lang; 2012 Oct; 123(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 22819308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Learning new meanings for known words: Perturbation of original meanings and retention of new meanings.
    Fang X; Perfetti CA
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):130-144. PubMed ID: 30168093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.