These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Ethical and legal issues in the care of the impaired newborn. Moreno JD Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):345-60. PubMed ID: 3595056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The U.S. Civil Rights Commission report, "Medical discrimination against children with disabilities": a brief commentary. Tucker BP Issues Law Med; 1990; 6(3):269-84. PubMed ID: 2149130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical issues in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Fost N Pediatr Ann; 1981 Oct; 10(10):16-22. PubMed ID: 7312441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical decision making in committee: the role of review boards and ethics committees in health care, health policy, and medical research. Sass HM Taiwan Yi Xue Ren Wen Xue Kan; 2000 Nov; 1(1):8-26. PubMed ID: 15008173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations. Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Withholding and termination of treatment in severely handicapped newborn infants]. Leenen HJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1984 May; 128(18):863-6. PubMed ID: 6728052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates. Gostin L Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neonatal ethics: development of a consultative group. Edens MJ; Eyler FD; Wagner JT; Eitzman DV Pediatrics; 1990 Dec; 86(6):944-9. PubMed ID: 2251031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment dilemmas for imperiled newborns: why quality of life counts. Rhoden NK South Calif Law Rev; 1985 Sep; 58(6):1283-347. PubMed ID: 11660412 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Supreme Court asked to review application of Rehabilitation Act to medical decisions. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 2931399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns. Fost N Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 2969769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Questions and (some very tentative) answers about hospital ethics committees. Levine C Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Jun; 14(3):9-12. PubMed ID: 6746275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regulation vs. autonomy: matching ethics and technology in medical practice. Castro M Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1984; 47(4):6-10. PubMed ID: 6505013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it? Clark FI Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Brooks BF J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 10280374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]