These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2928005)
21. Canada: conflict as well as consensus. Roy DJ; Williams JR Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S32-4. PubMed ID: 11644030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Infant care review committee and ethical decision making. Smith ED Nurs Adm Q; 1986; 10(3):44-50. PubMed ID: 3634948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria? Longino PH Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The civil rights of handicapped infants: an Oklahoma "experiment". Gerry MH Issues Law Med; 1985 Jul; 1(1):15-66. PubMed ID: 2931398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Consultations in clinical ethics--issues and questions in 27 cases. La Puma J West J Med; 1987 May; 146(5):633-7. PubMed ID: 3590772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Life-saving therapy for newborns: a questionnaire survey in the state of Massachusetts. Todres ID; Guillemin J; Grodin MA; Batten D Pediatrics; 1988 May; 81(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 2965806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bioethics in Romania. Maximilian C Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Oct; No. 72():22-3. PubMed ID: 11659453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Questions of life and death weighed by medical ethics watchdog commission. Stein J Natl J (Wash); 1982 Dec; 14(50):2119-21. PubMed ID: 10257316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ethical aspects of care of the newborn with serious neurological disease. Hemphill M; Freeman JM Clin Perinatol; 1977 Mar; 4(1):201-9. PubMed ID: 140034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Section 504, handicapped newborns, and ethics committees: an alternative to the hotline. Doudera AE Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):200-2, 236. PubMed ID: 6557311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Smith SR Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Withholding of nutrition and fluids in the hopelessly ill patient. Paris JJ; Fletcher AB Clin Perinatol; 1987 Jun; 14(2):367-77. PubMed ID: 3595058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Neonatologists and bioethics after Baby Doe. Carter BS J Perinatol; 1993; 13(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 8515309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse. Rhoden NK; Arras JD Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities. Barry RL Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Ethics committees in the United States. Capron AM Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):87-94. PubMed ID: 15282924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Limiting treatment in a social vacuum. A Greek chorus for William T. Hunter KM Arch Intern Med; 1985 Apr; 145(4):716-9. PubMed ID: 3985732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Murder, she wrote or was it merely selective nontreatment? Smith GP J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():49-71. PubMed ID: 10118990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]