BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29280165)

  • 1. Computer monitor pixellation and Sloan letter visual acuity measurement.
    Carkeet A; Lister LJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 29280165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer monitor pixellation and Landolt C visual acuity.
    Carkeet A; Lister L; Goh YT
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Nov; 41(6):1176-1182. PubMed ID: 34533231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Slope of psychometric functions and termination rule analysis for low contrast acuity charts.
    Carkeet A; Bailey IL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):118-127. PubMed ID: 28211180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simulated image doubling and visual acuity: effects of doubling magnitude, orientation, and ghost image intensity.
    Carkeet A; Chang YA; Chang TY; Chen PM; Gu M; Lin V; Ng JH
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Mar; 39(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 30776849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.
    Hall C; Wang S; McAnany JJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1125-32. PubMed ID: 26540471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of exposure duration on visual acuity for letter optotypes and gratings.
    McAnany JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():86-91. PubMed ID: 25281413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters.
    Alexander KR; Xie W; Derlacki DJ
    Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(6):813-9. PubMed ID: 9156226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual acuity vs letter contrast sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.
    Alexander KR; Derlacki DJ; Fishman GA
    Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(10):1495-9. PubMed ID: 7645278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of pixel nonlinearity on cathode-ray tube-based visual acuity tests.
    Liu L; Cho J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Nov; 79(11):724-34. PubMed ID: 12462541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distance word acuity, critical print size and driving vision standards.
    Rae S; Latham K; Katsou MF
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 26390909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mesopic visual acuity is less crowded.
    Pluháček F; Siderov J
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 256(9):1739-1746. PubMed ID: 29808376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of visual acuity with logarithmic charts: comparison between methods of threshold estimation.
    Sakuma JT; da Silva JA; Velasco e Cruz AA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Aug; 68(8):666-9. PubMed ID: 1923345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
    Rabin J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Desktop publishing and validation of custom near visual acuity charts.
    Marran L; Liu L; Lau G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 85(11):1082-90. PubMed ID: 18981923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting visual acuity from detection thresholds.
    Newacheck JS; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Adams AJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 67(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 2320362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Freiburg Visual Acuity test--automatic measurement of visual acuity.
    Bach M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jan; 73(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8867682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-based test to measure optimal visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration.
    González EG; Tarita-Nistor L; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4838-45. PubMed ID: 17898311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual acuity for optotypes made visible by relative motion.
    Regan D; Hong XH
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 2308752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.