These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29280179)

  • 1. Multiple-rater kappas for binary data: Models and interpretation.
    Stoyan D; Pommerening A; Hummel M; Kopp-Schneider A
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):381-394. PubMed ID: 29280179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing interrater agreement on binary measurements via intraclass odds ratio.
    Locatelli I; Rousson V
    Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):962-73. PubMed ID: 26988408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate?
    Zapf A; Castell S; Morawietz L; Karch A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16():93. PubMed ID: 27495131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Homogeneity score test of AC
    Honda C; Ohyama T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 32020851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing interrater agreement from dependent data.
    Williamson JM; Manatunga AK
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):707-14. PubMed ID: 9192459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the effects of rater and subject factors on measures of association.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):639-656. PubMed ID: 29349801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rater Training for a Multi-Site, International Clinical Trial: What Mood Symptoms may be most Difficult to Rate?
    Sajatovic M; Gaur R; Tatsuoka C; De Santi S; Lee N; Laredo J; Tripathi S
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 2011 Sep; 44(3):5-14. PubMed ID: 27738359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymptotic distributions of kappa statistics and their differences with many raters, many rating categories and two conditions.
    Grassano L; Pagana G; Daperno M; Bibbona E; Gasparini M
    Biom J; 2018 Jan; 60(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 29110316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the inter-rater agreement for ordinal data through weighted indexes.
    Marasini D; Quatto P; Ripamonti E
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2611-2633. PubMed ID: 24740999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing inter-rater reliability when the raters are fixed: Two concepts and two estimates.
    Rousson V
    Biom J; 2011 May; 53(3):477-90. PubMed ID: 21425184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing dependent kappa coefficients obtained on multilevel data.
    Vanbelle S
    Biom J; 2017 Sep; 59(5):1016-1034. PubMed ID: 28464322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring agreement of multivariate discrete survival times using a modified weighted kappa coefficient.
    Guo Y; Manatunga AK
    Biometrics; 2009 Mar; 65(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 18505422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measures of agreement between many raters for ordinal classifications.
    Nelson KP; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3116-32. PubMed ID: 26095449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interrater Agreement in the Radiologic Characterization of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Based on Computed Tomography Angiography.
    Maldaner N; Stienen MN; Bijlenga P; Croci D; Zumofen DW; Dalonzo D; Marbacher S; Maduri R; Daniel RT; Serra C; Esposito G; Neidert MC; Bozinov O; Regli L; Burkhardt JK
    World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():876-882.e1. PubMed ID: 28461281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robustness of
    Vanacore A; Pellegrino MS
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1986-2004. PubMed ID: 35124830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview.
    Wilson JT; Hareendran A; Hendry A; Potter J; Bone I; Muir KW
    Stroke; 2005 Apr; 36(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 15718510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-rater agreement of sputum cytology for lung cancer screening in Japan.
    Endo C; Nakashima R; Taguchi A; Yahata K; Kawahara E; Shimagaki N; Kamio J; Saito Y; Ikeda N; Sato M
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Jul; 43(7):545-50. PubMed ID: 25645403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inter-rater agreement on assessment of outcome within a trauma registry.
    Ekegren CL; Hart MJ; Brown A; Gabbe BJ
    Injury; 2016 Jan; 47(1):130-4. PubMed ID: 26304002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing the homogeneity of kappa statistics.
    Donner A; Eliasziw M; Klar N
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):176-83. PubMed ID: 8934591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.