These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29281002)

  • 1. An automated benchmarking platform for MHC class II binding prediction methods.
    Andreatta M; Trolle T; Yan Z; Greenbaum JA; Peters B; Nielsen M
    Bioinformatics; 2018 May; 34(9):1522-1528. PubMed ID: 29281002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automated benchmarking of peptide-MHC class I binding predictions.
    Trolle T; Metushi IG; Greenbaum JA; Kim Y; Sidney J; Lund O; Sette A; Peters B; Nielsen M
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2174-81. PubMed ID: 25717196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematically benchmarking peptide-MHC binding predictors: From synthetic to naturally processed epitopes.
    Zhao W; Sher X
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1006457. PubMed ID: 30408041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NN-align. An artificial neural network-based alignment algorithm for MHC class II peptide binding prediction.
    Nielsen M; Lund O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 10():296. PubMed ID: 19765293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accurate pan-specific prediction of peptide-MHC class II binding affinity with improved binding core identification.
    Andreatta M; Karosiene E; Rasmussen M; Stryhn A; Buus S; Nielsen M
    Immunogenetics; 2015 Nov; 67(11-12):641-50. PubMed ID: 26416257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of MHC-II peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research.
    Lin HH; Zhang GL; Tongchusak S; Reinherz EL; Brusic V
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S22. PubMed ID: 19091022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. NNAlign_MA; MHC Peptidome Deconvolution for Accurate MHC Binding Motif Characterization and Improved T-cell Epitope Predictions.
    Alvarez B; Reynisson B; Barra C; Buus S; Ternette N; Connelley T; Andreatta M; Nielsen M
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2019 Dec; 18(12):2459-2477. PubMed ID: 31578220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Building MHC class II epitope predictor using machine learning approaches.
    Eng LP; Tan TW; Tong JC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1268():67-73. PubMed ID: 25555721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved methods for predicting peptide binding affinity to MHC class II molecules.
    Jensen KK; Andreatta M; Marcatili P; Buus S; Greenbaum JA; Yan Z; Sette A; Peters B; Nielsen M
    Immunology; 2018 Jul; 154(3):394-406. PubMed ID: 29315598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. TepiTool: A Pipeline for Computational Prediction of T Cell Epitope Candidates.
    Paul S; Sidney J; Sette A; Peters B
    Curr Protoc Immunol; 2016 Aug; 114():18.19.1-18.19.24. PubMed ID: 27479659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MHCII-peptide presentation: an assessment of the state-of-the-art prediction methods.
    Yang Y; Wei Z; Cia G; Song X; Pucci F; Rooman M; Xue F; Hou Q
    Front Immunol; 2024; 15():1293706. PubMed ID: 38646540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved peptide-MHC class II interaction prediction through integration of eluted ligand and peptide affinity data.
    Garde C; Ramarathinam SH; Jappe EC; Nielsen M; Kringelum JV; Trolle T; Purcell AW
    Immunogenetics; 2019 Jul; 71(7):445-454. PubMed ID: 31183519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of MHC class II binding affinity using SMM-align, a novel stabilization matrix alignment method.
    Nielsen M; Lundegaard C; Lund O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():238. PubMed ID: 17608956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NetMHCIIpan-3.0, a common pan-specific MHC class II prediction method including all three human MHC class II isotypes, HLA-DR, HLA-DP and HLA-DQ.
    Karosiene E; Rasmussen M; Blicher T; Lund O; Buus S; Nielsen M
    Immunogenetics; 2013 Oct; 65(10):711-24. PubMed ID: 23900783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of a Predictive Cleavage Motif for Eluted Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Ligands.
    Paul S; Karosiene E; Dhanda SK; Jurtz V; Edwards L; Nielsen M; Sette A; Peters B
    Front Immunol; 2018; 9():1795. PubMed ID: 30127785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development and validation of an epitope prediction tool for swine (PigMatrix) based on the pocket profile method.
    Gutiérrez AH; Martin WD; Bailey-Kellogg C; Terry F; Moise L; De Groot AS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():290. PubMed ID: 26370412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCIIpan-4.0: improved predictions of MHC antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of MS MHC eluted ligand data.
    Reynisson B; Alvarez B; Paul S; Peters B; Nielsen M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jul; 48(W1):W449-W454. PubMed ID: 32406916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immune epitope database analysis resource.
    Kim Y; Ponomarenko J; Zhu Z; Tamang D; Wang P; Greenbaum J; Lundegaard C; Sette A; Lund O; Bourne PE; Nielsen M; Peters B
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Jul; 40(Web Server issue):W525-30. PubMed ID: 22610854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MHCII3D-Robust Structure Based Prediction of MHC II Binding Peptides.
    Laimer J; Lackner P
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 33374958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.