BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29281962)

  • 1. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition.
    Meuwissen THE; Indahl UG; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):94. PubMed ID: 29281962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic prediction of breeding values using previously estimated SNP variances.
    Calus MP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):52. PubMed ID: 25928875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction using an iterative conditional expectation algorithm for a fast BayesC-like model.
    Dong L; Wang Z
    Genetica; 2018 Oct; 146(4-5):361-368. PubMed ID: 29948517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
    Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. BESSiE: a software for linear model BLUP and Bayesian MCMC analysis of large-scale genomic data.
    Boerner V; Tier B
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):63. PubMed ID: 27590176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the use of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction and fine-scale mapping of QTL.
    Meuwissen T; van den Berg I; Goddard M
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Feb; 53(1):19. PubMed ID: 33637049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous fitting of genomic-BLUP and Bayes-C components in a genomic prediction model.
    Iheshiulor OOM; Woolliams JA; Svendsen M; Solberg T; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):63. PubMed ID: 28836944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A fast EM algorithm for BayesA-like prediction of genomic breeding values.
    Sun X; Qu L; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC; Fernando RL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49157. PubMed ID: 23152868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A class of Bayesian methods to combine large numbers of genotyped and non-genotyped animals for whole-genome analyses.
    Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):50. PubMed ID: 25253441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of a Bayesian non-linear model hybrid scheme to sequence data for genomic prediction and QTL mapping.
    Wang T; Chen YP; MacLeod IM; Pryce JE; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Aug; 18(1):618. PubMed ID: 28810831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fast genomic prediction of breeding values using parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo with convergence diagnosis.
    Guo P; Zhu B; Niu H; Wang Z; Liang Y; Chen Y; Zhang L; Ni H; Guo Y; Hay EHA; Gao X; Gao H; Wu X; Xu L; Li J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 29298666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of genomic selection for a sib-evaluated trait using identity-by-state and identity-by-descent relationships.
    Vela-Avitúa S; Meuwissen TH; Luan T; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):9. PubMed ID: 25888184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of whole-genome sequence data and novel genomic selection strategies to improve selection for age at puberty in tropically-adapted beef heifers.
    Warburton CL; Engle BN; Ross EM; Costilla R; Moore SS; Corbet NJ; Allen JM; Laing AR; Fordyce G; Lyons RE; McGowan MR; Burns BM; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 May; 52(1):28. PubMed ID: 32460805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Large-scale genomic prediction using singular value decomposition of the genotype matrix.
    Ødegård J; Indahl U; Strandén I; Meuwissen THE
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Feb; 50(1):6. PubMed ID: 29490611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.