691 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29281975)
1. A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals.
Faggion CM; Bakas NP; Wasiak J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):176. PubMed ID: 29281975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical journals' conflicts of interest in the publication of book reviews.
Davis RM; Neale AV; Monsur JC
Sci Eng Ethics; 2003 Oct; 9(4):471-83. PubMed ID: 14652900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.
Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
BMC Med; 2003 Nov; 1():2. PubMed ID: 14633274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals.
Flanagin A; Carey LA; Fontanarosa PB; Phillips SG; Pace BP; Lundberg GD; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 9676661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals.
Clarke M; Alderson P; Chalmers I
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(21):2799-801. PubMed ID: 12038916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends and comparison of female first authorship in high impact medical journals: observational study (1994-2014).
Filardo G; da Graca B; Sass DM; Pollock BD; Smith EB; Martinez MA
BMJ; 2016 Mar; 352():i847. PubMed ID: 26935100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The 300 most cited articles published in periodontology.
Faggion CM; Málaga L; Monje A; Trescher AL; Listl S; Alarcón MA
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jul; 21(6):2021-2028. PubMed ID: 27844151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
Nielsen MB; Seitz K
Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Design and level of evidence of studies published in two Brazilian medical journals recently indexed in the ISI Web of Science database.
Torloni MR; Riera R
Sao Paulo Med J; 2010 Jul; 128(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 21120430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time.
Goldacre B; Drysdale H; Dale A; Milosevic I; Slade E; Hartley P; Marston C; Powell-Smith A; Heneghan C; Mahtani KR
Trials; 2019 Feb; 20(1):118. PubMed ID: 30760329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published?
Koletsi D; Karagianni A; Pandis N; Makou M; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):632.e1-5; discussion 632-3. PubMed ID: 19892276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high-impact nursing journals: a review of the literature.
Pölkki T; Kanste O; Kääriäinen M; Elo S; Kyngäs H
J Clin Nurs; 2014 Feb; 23(3-4):315-32. PubMed ID: 23489745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement.
Lee SY; Sagoo H; Farwana R; Whitehurst K; Fowler A; Agha R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In which journals will pediatricians find the best evidence for clinical practice?
Birken CS; Parkin PC
Pediatrics; 1999 May; 103(5 Pt 1):941-7. PubMed ID: 10224169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic reviewers commonly contact study authors but do so with limited rigor.
Mullan RJ; Flynn DN; Carlberg B; Tleyjeh IM; Kamath CC; LaBella ML; Erwin PJ; Guyatt GH; Montori VM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 62(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 19013767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Doubling the impact: publication of systematic review articles in orthopaedic journals.
Bhandari M; Montori VM; Devereaux PJ; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 May; 86(5):1012-6. PubMed ID: 15118046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
