1014 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29281985)
1. Deep convolutional neural networks for pan-specific peptide-MHC class I binding prediction.
Han Y; Kim D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):585. PubMed ID: 29281985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematically benchmarking peptide-MHC binding predictors: From synthetic to naturally processed epitopes.
Zhao W; Sher X
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1006457. PubMed ID: 30408041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DeepNetBim: deep learning model for predicting HLA-epitope interactions based on network analysis by harnessing binding and immunogenicity information.
Yang X; Zhao L; Wei F; Li J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 22(1):231. PubMed ID: 33952199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving the prediction of HLA class I-binding peptides using a supertype-based method.
Wang S; Bai Z; Han J; Tian Y; Shang X; Wang L; Li J; Wu Y
J Immunol Methods; 2014 Mar; 405():109-20. PubMed ID: 24508661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DeepSeqPan, a novel deep convolutional neural network model for pan-specific class I HLA-peptide binding affinity prediction.
Liu Z; Cui Y; Xiong Z; Nasiri A; Zhang A; Hu J
Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):794. PubMed ID: 30692623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. IConMHC: a deep learning convolutional neural network model to predict peptide and MHC-I binding affinity.
Pei B; Hsu YH
Immunogenetics; 2020 Jul; 72(5):295-304. PubMed ID: 32577798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pan-specific MHC class I predictors: a benchmark of HLA class I pan-specific prediction methods.
Zhang H; Lundegaard C; Nielsen M
Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 25(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 18996943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. HLA class I binding prediction via convolutional neural networks.
Vang YS; Xie X
Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 33(17):2658-2665. PubMed ID: 28444127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comprehensive review and performance evaluation of bioinformatics tools for HLA class I peptide-binding prediction.
Mei S; Li F; Leier A; Marquez-Lago TT; Giam K; Croft NP; Akutsu T; Smith AI; Li J; Rossjohn J; Purcell AW; Song J
Brief Bioinform; 2020 Jul; 21(4):1119-1135. PubMed ID: 31204427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PromPDD, a web-based tool for the prediction, deciphering and design of promiscuous peptides that bind to HLA class I molecules.
Zhang S; Chen J; Hong P; Li J; Tian Y; Wu Y; Wang S
J Immunol Methods; 2020 Jan; 476():112685. PubMed ID: 31678214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep learning pan-specific model for interpretable MHC-I peptide binding prediction with improved attention mechanism.
Jin J; Liu Z; Nasiri A; Cui Y; Louis SY; Zhang A; Zhao Y; Hu J
Proteins; 2021 Jul; 89(7):866-883. PubMed ID: 33594723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of supertype-specific HLA class I binding peptides using support vector machines.
Zhang GL; Bozic I; Kwoh CK; August JT; Brusic V
J Immunol Methods; 2007 Mar; 320(1-2):143-54. PubMed ID: 17303158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In silico design of MHC class I high binding affinity peptides through motifs activation map.
Xiao Z; Zhang Y; Yu R; Chen Y; Jiang X; Wang Z; Li S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 19):516. PubMed ID: 30598069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. NetMHC-3.0: accurate web accessible predictions of human, mouse and monkey MHC class I affinities for peptides of length 8-11.
Lundegaard C; Lamberth K; Harndahl M; Buus S; Lund O; Nielsen M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Jul; 36(Web Server issue):W509-12. PubMed ID: 18463140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The HLA A03 Supertype and Several
de Groot NG; Heijmans CMC; de Ru AH; Otting N; Koning F; van Veelen PA; Bontrop RE
J Virol; 2020 Apr; 94(9):. PubMed ID: 32075930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MHCSeqNet: a deep neural network model for universal MHC binding prediction.
Phloyphisut P; Pornputtapong N; Sriswasdi S; Chuangsuwanich E
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):270. PubMed ID: 31138107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benchmarking predictions of MHC class I restricted T cell epitopes in a comprehensively studied model system.
Paul S; Croft NP; Purcell AW; Tscharke DC; Sette A; Nielsen M; Peters B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 May; 16(5):e1007757. PubMed ID: 32453790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated benchmarking of peptide-MHC class I binding predictions.
Trolle T; Metushi IG; Greenbaum JA; Kim Y; Sidney J; Lund O; Sette A; Peters B; Nielsen M
Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2174-81. PubMed ID: 25717196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved pan-specific MHC class I peptide-binding predictions using a novel representation of the MHC-binding cleft environment.
Carrasco Pro S; Zimic M; Nielsen M
Tissue Antigens; 2014 Feb; 83(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24447175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
