These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29282020)
1. Efficacy and safety of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking surgery versus standard corneal collagen crosslinking surgery for keratoconus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Li W; Wang B BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):262. PubMed ID: 29282020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus. Ng SM; Ren M; Lindsley KB; Hawkins BS; Kuo IC Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 3(3):CD013512. PubMed ID: 33765359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard corneal collagen crosslinking versus transepithelial iontophoresis-assisted corneal crosslinking, 24 months follow-up: randomized control trial. Bikbova G; Bikbov M Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 94(7):e600-e606. PubMed ID: 27040458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Epithelium-on versus epithelium-off corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Borchert GA; Kandel H; Watson SL Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; 262(6):1683-1692. PubMed ID: 37938377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus in a pediatric age group. Salman AG J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1164-70. PubMed ID: 23790531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Topographic, corneal wavefront, and refractive outcomes 2 years after collagen crosslinking for progressive keratoconus. Ghanem RC; Santhiago MR; Berti T; Netto MV; Ghanem VC Cornea; 2014 Jan; 33(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24162747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of transepithelial corneal crosslinking with iontophoresis for keratoconus. Lombardo M; Serrao S; Lombardo G; Schiano-Lomoriello D J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul; 45(7):992-1000. PubMed ID: 31003798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking with epithelium-off crosslinking in progressive keratoconus. Kocak I; Aydin A; Kaya F; Koc H J Fr Ophtalmol; 2014 May; 37(5):371-6. PubMed ID: 24679451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-Off Corneal Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review. Ng SM; Hawkins BS; Kuo IC Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 229():274-287. PubMed ID: 34048801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complete corneal ring (MyoRing) implantation versus MyoRing implantation combined with corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: 3-year follow-up. Bikbova G; Kazakbaeva G; Bikbov M; Usubov E Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 38(3):1285-1293. PubMed ID: 28620706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epithelium-Off vs. transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking in progressive keratoconus: 3 years of follow-up. Arance-Gil Á; Villa-Collar C; Pérez-Sanchez B; Carracedo G; Gutiérrez-Ortega R J Optom; 2021; 14(2):189-198. PubMed ID: 32883647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical Performance of the Cornea One Year Following Keratoconus Treatment with Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking. Uysal BS; Sarac O; Yaman D; Akcay E; Cagil N Curr Eye Res; 2018 Dec; 43(12):1415-1421. PubMed ID: 30012019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]