These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29282141)
1. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Chen H; Ma B; Gao P; Wang H; Song Y; Tong L; Li P; Wang Z World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Dec; 15(1):229. PubMed ID: 29282141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure. Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer. Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: clinical outcomes of open versus laparoscopic approach and multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic surgery. Kuo LJ; Hung CS; Wang W; Tam KW; Lee HC; Liang HH; Chang YJ; Huang MT; Wei PL J Surg Res; 2013 Aug; 183(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 23465434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes. Park JS; Choi GS; Jun SH; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y Ann Surg; 2011 Dec; 254(6):941-6. PubMed ID: 22076066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic Versus Conventional Open Surgery in Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Zhang X; Wu Q; Hu T; Gu C; Bi L; Wang Z J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Feb; 28(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 29232537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer and comparison with open approach. Yamamoto S; Fujita S; Akasu T; Inada R; Takawa M; Moriya Y Dig Surg; 2011; 28(5-6):404-9. PubMed ID: 22189000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a clinical comparative study]. Zhou T; Zhang GJ; Liu ZL; Tian HP Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 16(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 23801212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes. Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intersphincteric resection and hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: Short-term outcomes in the Indian setting. Pai VD; De Souza A; Patil P; Engineer R; Arya S; Saklani A Indian J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jan; 34(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25583650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic transabdominal approach partial intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: surgical feasibility and intermediate-term outcome. Chi P; Huang SH; Lin HM; Lu XR; Huang Y; Jiang WZ; Xu ZB; Chen ZF; Sun YW; Ye DX Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):944-51. PubMed ID: 25245128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review. Iwamoto M; Kawada K; Hida K; Hasegawa S; Sakai Y World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Aug; 15(1):143. PubMed ID: 28764707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicentre study of robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Park JS; Kim NK; Kim SH; Lee KY; Lee KY; Shin JY; Kim CN; Choi GS; Br J Surg; 2015 Nov; 102(12):1567-73. PubMed ID: 26312601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection from a phase II trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for stage 0/I rectal cancer: Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Lap RC. Fujii S; Yamamoto S; Ito M; Yamaguchi S; Sakamoto K; Kinugasa Y; Kokuba Y; Okuda J; Yoshimura K; Watanabe M Surg Endosc; 2012 Nov; 26(11):3067-76. PubMed ID: 22580882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Short-term efficacy comparison of laparoscopic versus open transabdominal intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer]. Huang S; Chi P; Lin H; Lu X; Huang Y; Xu Z; Sun Y; Ye D; Wang X; Lin X Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 19(8):923-7. PubMed ID: 27545469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open surgery approach. Laurent C; Paumet T; Leblanc F; Denost Q; Rullier E Colorectal Dis; 2012 Jan; 14(1):35-41; discussion 42-3. PubMed ID: 21114752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of classic randomized controlled trials and high-quality Nonrandomized Studies in the last 5 years. Chen K; Cao G; Chen B; Wang M; Xu X; Cai W; Xu Y; Xiong M Int J Surg; 2017 Mar; 39():1-10. PubMed ID: 28087370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients. Leong QM; Son DN; Cho JS; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Amar AH; Kim SH Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2987-92. PubMed ID: 21484533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]