201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29282563)
1. Development of a test grid using Eye Movement Perimetry for screening glaucomatous visual field defects.
Kadavath Meethal NS; Mazumdar D; Asokan R; Panday M; van der Steen J; Vermeer KA; Lemij HG; George RJ; Pel JJM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 256(2):371-379. PubMed ID: 29282563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
Johnson CA; Samuels SJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased detection rate of glaucomatous visual field damage with locally condensed grids: a comparison between fundus-oriented perimetry and conventional visual field examination.
Schiefer U; Flad M; Stumpp F; Malsam A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Denk PO; Sample PA
Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 121(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 12695242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Entoptic perimetry screening for central diabetic scotomas and macular edema.
Brown JC; Kylstra JA; Mah ML
Ophthalmology; 2000 Apr; 107(4):755-9. PubMed ID: 10768339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early detection of glaucoma by means of a novel 3D computer-automated visual field test.
Nazemi PP; Fink W; Sadun AA; Francis B; Minckler D
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1331-6. PubMed ID: 17504855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of high spatial resolution perimetry to identify scotomata not apparent with conventional perimetry in the nasal field of glaucomatous subjects.
Westcott MC; Garway-Heath DF; Fitzke FW; Kamal D; Hitchings RA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jul; 86(7):761-6. PubMed ID: 12084745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Mutlukan E; Damato BE; Jay JL
Br J Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 77(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 8318478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Objective perimetry in glaucoma.
Klistorner A; Graham SL
Ophthalmology; 2000 Dec; 107(12):2283-99. PubMed ID: 11097611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Computer perimetry of glaucomatous visual field defects at different stimulus sizes (author's transl)].
Gramer E; Kontić D; Krieglstein GK
Ophthalmologica; 1981; 183(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 7312301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual field defects in children with congenital glaucoma.
de Souza EC; Berezovsky A; Morales PH; de Arruda Mello PA; de Oliveira Bonomo PP; Salomão SR
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2000; 37(5):266-72. PubMed ID: 11020107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deviated Saccadic Trajectory as a Biometric Signature of Glaucoma.
Yeon JS; Jung HN; Kim JY; Jung KI; Park HL; Park CK; Kim HW; Kim MS; Kim YC
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2023 Jul; 12(7):15. PubMed ID: 37440248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High spatial resolution automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Westcott MC; McNaught AI; Crabb DP; Fitzke FW; Hitchings RA
Br J Ophthalmol; 1997 Jun; 81(6):452-9. PubMed ID: 9274408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the sampling frequency of an eye tracker affect the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss?
Maniarasu P; Shasane PH; Pai VH; Kuzhuppilly NIR; Ve RS; Ballae Ganeshrao S
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Mar; 44(2):378-387. PubMed ID: 38149468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating a visual field screening test for glaucoma: how the choice of the gold standard affects the validity of the test.
Ellish NJ; Higginbotham EJ
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 8(5):297-307. PubMed ID: 11922383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of Goldmann III, V and spatially equated test stimuli in visual field testing: the importance of complete and partial spatial summation.
Phu J; Khuu SK; Zangerl B; Kalloniatis M
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar; 37(2):160-176. PubMed ID: 28211185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Wishart PK
Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The effectiveness of glaucomatous visual field test using a size I stimulus].
Osako M; Osako S; Hashimoto K; Okano T
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Mar; 103(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 10214054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The TsiogkaSpaeth grid for detection of neurological visual field defects: a validation study.
Tsiogka A; Moster ML; Chatzistefanou KI; Karmiris E; Samoli E; Giachos I; Droutsas K; Papaconstantinou D; Spaeth GL
Neurol Sci; 2024 Jun; 45(6):2869-2875. PubMed ID: 38191765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of kinetic perimetry assessment with the Humphrey 850; an exploratory comparative study.
Rowe FJ; Hepworth LR; Hanna KL; Mistry M; Noonan CP
Eye (Lond); 2019 Dec; 33(12):1952-1960. PubMed ID: 31332292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
