These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29283506)

  • 1. Inductive reasoning 2.0.
    Hayes BK; Heit E
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 9(3):e1459. PubMed ID: 29283506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inductive reasoning.
    Hayes BK; Heit E; Swendsen H
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 1(2):278-292. PubMed ID: 26271241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.
    Tenenbaum JB; Griffiths TL; Kemp C
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2006 Jul; 10(7):309-18. PubMed ID: 16797219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A dynamic model of reasoning and memory.
    Hawkins GE; Hayes BK; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):155-180. PubMed ID: 26569129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structured statistical models of inductive reasoning.
    Kemp C; Tenenbaum JB
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Jan; 116(1):20-58. PubMed ID: 19159147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of inductive reasoning.
    Heit E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Dec; 7(4):569-92. PubMed ID: 11206199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sampling assumptions in inductive generalization.
    Navarro DJ; Dry MJ; Lee MD
    Cogn Sci; 2012 Mar; 36(2):187-223. PubMed ID: 22141440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How do people learn from negative evidence? Non-monotonic generalizations and sampling assumptions in inductive reasoning.
    Voorspoels W; Navarro DJ; Perfors A; Ransom K; Storms G
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():1-25. PubMed ID: 26207331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of inductive generalization with familiar categories.
    Fisher AV; Godwin KE; Matlen BJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1149-73. PubMed ID: 25737367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reasoning processes in clinical reasoning: from the perspective of cognitive psychology.
    Shin HS
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Dec; 31(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 31813196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process.
    Hayes BK; Stephens RG; Ngo J; Dunn JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1333-1351. PubMed ID: 29389195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship between memory and inductive reasoning: does it develop?
    Hayes BK; Fritz K; Heit E
    Dev Psychol; 2013 May; 49(5):848-60. PubMed ID: 22686173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The engine of thought is a hybrid: roles of associative and structured knowledge in reasoning.
    Bright AK; Feeney A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Dec; 143(6):2082-102. PubMed ID: 25199040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diversity effect in inductive reasoning depends on sampling assumptions.
    Hayes BK; Navarro DJ; Stephens RG; Ransom K; Dilevski N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):1043-1050. PubMed ID: 30684248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting reasoning from memory.
    Heit E; Hayes BK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):76-101. PubMed ID: 21299318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models.
    Lee MD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 18605474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Who is sensitive to selection biases in inductive reasoning?
    Hayes BK; Liew SX; Connor Desai S; Navarro DJ; Wen Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Feb; 49(2):284-300. PubMed ID: 36006725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain.
    Dayan P; Daw ND
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 8(4):429-53. PubMed ID: 19033240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.