These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29283596)

  • 21. Higher amplitudes in steady-state visual evoked potentials driven by square-wave versus sine-wave contrast modulation - A dual-laboratory study.
    Panitz C; Gundlach C; Boylan MR; Keil A; Müller MM
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14287. PubMed ID: 36906882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can the spotlight of attention be shaped like a doughnut? Evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Müller MM; Hübner R
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Mar; 13(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 11933994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Time course of affective bias in visual attention: convergent evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials and behavioral data.
    Hindi Attar C; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2010 Dec; 53(4):1326-33. PubMed ID: 20615472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional Modulation in Early Visual Cortex: A Focused Reanalysis of Steady-state Visual Evoked Potential Studies.
    Adamian N; Andersen SK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Jan; 36(1):46-70. PubMed ID: 37847846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stimulator Selection in SSVEP-Based Spatial Selective Attention Study.
    Xie S; Liu C; Obermayer K; Zhu F; Wang L; Xie X; Wang W
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2016; 2016():6410718. PubMed ID: 28044073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hypervigilance during anxiety and selective attention during fear: Using steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) to disentangle attention mechanisms during predictable and unpredictable threat.
    Kastner-Dorn AK; Andreatta M; Pauli P; Wieser MJ
    Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():120-131. PubMed ID: 29929061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Communicative signals during joint attention promote neural processes of infants and caregivers.
    Bánki A; Köster M; Cichy RM; Hoehl S
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Feb; 65():101321. PubMed ID: 38061133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention.
    Müller MM; Teder-Sälejärvi W; Hillyard SA
    Nat Neurosci; 1998 Nov; 1(7):631-4. PubMed ID: 10196572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Steady-state visually evoked potential correlates of object recognition.
    Kaspar K; Hassler U; Martens U; Trujillo-Barreto N; Gruber T
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1343():112-21. PubMed ID: 20450897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Frequency-modulated steady-state visual evoked potentials: a new stimulation method for brain-computer interfaces.
    Dreyer AM; Herrmann CS
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Feb; 241():1-9. PubMed ID: 25522824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Steady-state visual evoked potentials differentiate between internally and externally directed attention.
    Kritzman L; Eidelman-Rothman M; Keil A; Freche D; Sheppes G; Levit-Binnun N
    Neuroimage; 2022 Jul; 254():119133. PubMed ID: 35339684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sustained hypervigilance for one's own body in women with weight and shape concerns: Competition effects in early visual processing investigated by steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP).
    Voges MM; Giabbiconi CM; Gruber T; Andersen SK; Hartmann AS; Vocks S
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Apr; 143():74-84. PubMed ID: 30802480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Preliminary Study on Normalized Pattern-Reversal Peripheral Field SSVEPs as a Potential Objective Indicator of Useful Field of View Performance.
    Lin ST; Tey LK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 57(7):3248-56. PubMed ID: 27315540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A multi-command SSVEP-based BCI system based on single flickering frequency half-field steady-state visual stimulation.
    Punsawad Y; Wongsawat Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2017 Jun; 55(6):965-977. PubMed ID: 27651060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional dynamics of infant visual foraging.
    Robertson SS; Watamura SE; Wilbourn MP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jul; 109(28):11460-4. PubMed ID: 22733754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles.
    Walter S; Keitel C; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 26401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Unexpected Sounds Nonselectively Inhibit Active Visual Stimulus Representations.
    Soh C; Wessel JR
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 Feb; 31(3):1632-1646. PubMed ID: 33140100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication.
    Kelly SP; Lalor EC; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Jun; 13(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16003896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliance on visual attention during visuomotor adaptation: an SSVEP study.
    Reuter EM; Bednark J; Cunnington R
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2041-51. PubMed ID: 25893908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity.
    Thigpen NN; Bradley MM; Keil A
    J Vis; 2018 Jun; 18(6):7. PubMed ID: 30029218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.