These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29283596)

  • 41. Assessing the relationship between pupil diameter and visuocortical activity.
    Thigpen NN; Bradley MM; Keil A
    J Vis; 2018 Jun; 18(6):7. PubMed ID: 30029218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Exploring steady-state visual evoked potentials as an index for intermodal and crossmodal spatial attention.
    Zhang D; Hong B; Gao X; Gao S; Röder B
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):665-75. PubMed ID: 20874752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Use of high-frequency visual stimuli above the critical flicker frequency in a SSVEP-based BMI.
    Sakurada T; Kawase T; Komatsu T; Kansaku K
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Oct; 126(10):1972-8. PubMed ID: 25577407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influences of encoding and retrieval on the steady-state visual evoked potential.
    Martens U; Gert AL; Gruber T
    Neuroreport; 2012 Apr; 23(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 22367760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Extent and time-course of competition in visual cortex between emotionally arousing distractors and a concurrent task.
    Deweese MM; Müller M; Keil A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Apr; 43(7):961-70. PubMed ID: 26790572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reinforcement history shapes primary visual cortical responses: An SSVEP study.
    Griffiths O; Gwinn OS; Russo S; Baetu I; Nicholls MER
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Jan; 158():108004. PubMed ID: 33290847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A category-specific top-down attentional set can affect the neural responses outside the current focus of attention.
    Jiang Y; Wu X; Gao X
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Oct; 659():80-85. PubMed ID: 28735084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparison of covert and overt attention as a control option in a steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain computer interface.
    Kelly SP; Lalor E; Finucane C; Reilly RB
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2004; 2004():4725-8. PubMed ID: 17271364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.
    Itthipuripat S; Garcia JO; Serences JT
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 May; 109(9):2364-73. PubMed ID: 23390315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Keeping focused: sustained spatial selective visual attention is maintained in healthy old age.
    Quigley C; Andersen SK; Müller MM
    Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1469():24-34. PubMed ID: 22765915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Emotional faces boost up steady-state visual responses for brain-computer interface.
    Bakardjian H; Tanaka T; Cichocki A
    Neuroreport; 2011 Feb; 22(3):121-5. PubMed ID: 21178643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mindful breath awareness meditation facilitates efficiency gains in brain networks: A steady-state visually evoked potentials study.
    Schöne B; Gruber T; Graetz S; Bernhof M; Malinowski P
    Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13687. PubMed ID: 30209327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Location and features of instructive spatial cues do not influence the time course of covert shifts of visual spatial attention.
    Müller MM
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Mar; 77(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 18083290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of higher frequency on the classification of steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Won DO; Hwang HJ; Dähne S; Müller KR; Lee SW
    J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016014. PubMed ID: 26695712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Task-guided attention increases non-linearity of steady-state visually evoked potentials.
    Harel A; Shriki O
    J Neural Eng; 2024 Oct; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 39326449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.
    Bekhtereva V; Craddock M; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():254-266. PubMed ID: 25818682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.
    Malinowski P; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17207932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A frequency-tagging electrophysiological method to identify central and peripheral visual field deficits.
    Hébert-Lalonde N; Carmant L; Safi D; Roy MS; Lassonde M; Saint-Amour D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 129(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 24817488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An independent brain-computer interface using covert non-spatial visual selective attention.
    Zhang D; Maye A; Gao X; Hong B; Engel AK; Gao S
    J Neural Eng; 2010 Feb; 7(1):16010. PubMed ID: 20083864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.