These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 292837)

  • 1. Health cost control. Maryland experience: provider's incubus.
    Dembo DH
    N Y State J Med; 1979 Nov; 79(12):1859-63. PubMed ID: 292837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. St. Elizabeth Ann Seton Memorial Lecture.
    Sarbanes PS
    Md State Med J; 1980 May; 29(5):39-42. PubMed ID: 7382569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Illinois: a public data state's experience.
    Bailey CS; Scheer SB
    Mich Hosp; 1988 Oct; 24(10):35-9. PubMed ID: 10290190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arizona hospital cost battle goes to the polls; voters to decide rate control issue.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(5):37-8. PubMed ID: 10270111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Arizona health care confrontation.
    Hirsch RS
    Internist; 1985 Feb; 26(2):15-6. PubMed ID: 10270281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Arizona: what happened and why. Part 2.
    Flower J
    Hosp Forum; 1985; 28(3):75, 78, 80. PubMed ID: 10272327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capital caps a return to basics.
    VanHeest PE
    Mich Hosp; 1984 Jan; 20(1):13, 15-6. PubMed ID: 10264386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Capital cap proposal: why hospitals are against it.
    Scheer SB
    Mich Hosp; 1984 Jan; 20(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10264391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arizona's healthcare cost war holds lessons for entire nation.
    Nathanson M
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(14):48-54. PubMed ID: 10268801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tough-minded cost control commission keeps lid on Maryland hospital rates.
    Demkovich LE
    Natl J (Wash); 1979 Aug; 11(33):1361-5. PubMed ID: 10273155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital payment coalition formed.
    Fisher MJ
    Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1984 Oct; 88(42):4, 35. PubMed ID: 10299721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maryland regulatory agency, planners feud over approval of projects.
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Dec; 11(7):43-5. PubMed ID: 10277903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The administration's case for "hospital cost containment": a critical analysis.
    Stockman D; Gramm P
    Tex Hosp; 1979 Jul; 35(2):26-37 contd. PubMed ID: 10308992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perspectives. Maryland reform seeks cost containment.
    Anderson JM
    Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1993 Jun; 47(26):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10126520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consequences of hospital controls.
    Feldstein M
    Wall St J Midwest Ed; 1979 Apr; 59(125):20. PubMed ID: 10241049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost cap bill topped agenda in first session of 96th Congress.
    Rittinger K
    Hospitals; 1979 Dec; 53(24):55-9. PubMed ID: 500055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost caps and other health related issues.
    Gammage B
    Tex Hosp; 1978 Oct; 34(5):8-14. PubMed ID: 10238922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost effectiveness in health care takes competition, Friedman thinks.
    Friedman M
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1977 Apr; 10(2):22-4. PubMed ID: 10242897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health care issues and welfare plans: impact of hospital cost review on industrial relations.
    Weinstein PA
    Labor Law J; 1979 Aug; 30(8):503-13. PubMed ID: 10243596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. House defeats administration cost control legislation.
    Bloom MZ
    Hospitals; 1979 Dec; 53(23):23-4, 21. PubMed ID: 500034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.