These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2928382)

  • 1. Evaluation of the elastic behaviour of central venous PVC, polyurethane and silicone catheters.
    Cervera M; Dolz M; Herraez JV; Belda R
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Feb; 34(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 2928382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stiffness of central venous catheters.
    Stenqvist O; Curelaru I; Linder LE; Gustavsson B
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1983 Apr; 27(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 6837249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevention of thrombosis of central venous catheters.
    Borow M; Crowley JG
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1986; 27(5):571-4. PubMed ID: 3760021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization III. A comparison between soft polyvinylchloride and soft polyurethane elastomer, long, antebrachial catheters.
    Curelaru I; Gustavsson B; Hultman E; Jondmundsson E; Linder LE; Stefánsson T; Stenqvist O
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1984 Apr; 28(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 6730884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sorption of isosorbide dinitrate to central venous catheters.
    De Muynck C; Vandenbossche GM; Colardyn F; Remon JP
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 1993 Feb; 45(2):139-41. PubMed ID: 8095530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Silicone and polyurethane tunneled infusion catheters: a comparison of durability and breakage rates.
    Cohen AB; Dagli M; Stavropoulos SW; Mondschein JI; Soulen MC; Shlansky-Goldberg RD; Solomon JA; Chittams JL; Trerotola SO
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 May; 22(5):638-41. PubMed ID: 21514517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of silicone and polyurethane PICC lines and postinsertion complication rates: a systematic review.
    Seckold T; Walker S; Dwyer T
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 25634150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.
    Wildgruber M; Lueg C; Borgmeyer S; Karimov I; Braun U; Kiechle M; Meier R; Koehler M; Ettl J; Berger H
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 59():113-124. PubMed ID: 27023050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.
    Ong CK; Venkatesh SK; Lau GB; Wang SC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1191-6. PubMed ID: 20598573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variations in epidural catheter manufacture: implications for bending and stiffness.
    Eckmann DM
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2003; 28(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 12567342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two types of catheters through femoral vein catheterization in patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A retrospective study.
    Xu B; Zhang J; Tang S; Hou J; Ma M
    J Vasc Access; 2018 Nov; 19(6):651-657. PubMed ID: 29701120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture of totally implanted central venous access devices: a propensity-score-matched comparison of risks for Groshong silicone versus polyurethane catheters.
    Kojima S; Hiraki T; Gobara H; Iguchi T; Fujiwara H; Matsui Y; Mitsuhashi T; Kanazawa S
    J Vasc Access; 2016 Nov; 17(6):535-541. PubMed ID: 27768210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relevance of type of catheters for central venous pressure measurement.
    Santelices S; Sullivan KJ; Kissoon N; Duckworth LJ; Murphy SP
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2004 Jul; 20(7):448-52. PubMed ID: 15232245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of relative perforating potential of central venous catheters: comparison of materials, selected models, number of lumens, and angles of incidence to simulated membrane.
    Gravenstein N; Blackshear RH
    J Clin Monit; 1991 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1999693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Thrombogenicity of central venous catheters: prospective study of polyethylene, silicone and polyurethane catheters with phlebography or post-mortem examination.
    Pottecher T; Forrler M; Picardat P; Krause D; Bellocq JP; Otteni JC
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1984 Dec; 1(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 6536520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Power injection of peripherally inserted central catheters.
    Rivitz SM; Drucker EA
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(5):857-63. PubMed ID: 9314379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Central venous catheter stiffness and its relation to vascular perforation.
    Bersten AD; Williams DR; Phillips GD
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 1988 Aug; 16(3):342-51. PubMed ID: 3189745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do bevacizumab solutions interact with silicone or polyurethane catheters during an infusion through implantable venous access ports?
    Tokhadzé N; Chennell P; Cueff R; Sautou V
    J R Soc Interface; 2019 Sep; 16(158):20180721. PubMed ID: 31551048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new technique for transumbilical insertion of central venous silicone catheters in newborn infants.
    Haumont D; de Beauregard VG; Van Herreweghe I; Delanghe G; Ciardelli R; Haelterman E
    Acta Paediatr; 2008 Jul; 97(7):988-90. PubMed ID: 18422804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neonatal percutaneous central venous lines: fit to burst.
    Smirk C; Soosay Raj T; Smith AL; Morris S
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2009 Jul; 94(4):F298-300. PubMed ID: 19190007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.