These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2928389)

  • 1. Sensitivity of LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters to 6-18 keV photons.
    Ahmed AB; Barber DE
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Mar; 34(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 2928389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays.
    Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Energy response of LiF and Mg2SiO4 TLDs to 10-150 keV monoenergetic photons.
    Konnai A; Nariyama N; Ohnishi S; Odano N
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):334-6. PubMed ID: 16381741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance characteristics of LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters employed in the National Personnel Radiation Dose Services in Tanzania.
    Ngaile JE; Muhogora WE
    J Radiol Prot; 2004 Jun; 24(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 15296259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti.
    Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The low- and high-temperature response of lithium fluoride dosemeters to X-rays.
    Budd T; Marshall M; Peaple LH; Douglas JA
    Phys Med Biol; 1979 Jan; 24(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 432275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy response of GR-200A thermoluminescence dosemeters to 60Co and to monoenergetic synchrotron radiation in the energy range 28-40 keV.
    Emiro F; Di Lillo F; Mettivier G; Fedon C; Longo R; Tromba G; Russo P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jan; 168(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 25737582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A high sensitivity LiF thermoluminescent dosimeter--LiF(Mg, Cu, P).
    Wu DK; Sun FY; Dai HC
    Health Phys; 1984 May; 46(5):1063-7. PubMed ID: 6724912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy response of different types of RADOS personal dosemeters with MTS-N (LiF:Mg,Ti) and MCP-N (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) TL detectors.
    Obryk B; Hranitzky C; Stadtmann H; Budzanowski M; Olko P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):211-4. PubMed ID: 21227957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV.
    Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A whole-body dosimetry system for personal monitoring based on hot-pressed thin layer TLD.
    Busch F; Engelhardt J; Martini E; Lesz J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):246-8. PubMed ID: 21227958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the variation of energy spectra with depth in the dosimetry of 192Ir using LiF TLD.
    Meigooni AS; Meli JA; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 1988 Oct; 33(10):1159-70. PubMed ID: 3194446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative thermoluminescence efficiency of TLD-600 and TLD-700 dosemeters irradiated with 59.8 MeV per nucleon krypton-86 ions.
    Mukherjee B; Ronningen RM; Cross P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):537-9. PubMed ID: 12382938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In-phantom response of LiF TLD-100 for dosimetry of 192Ir HDR source.
    Pradhan AS; Quast U
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):1025-9. PubMed ID: 10841406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Burlin cavity theory with LiF TLD measurements for cobalt-60 gamma rays.
    Ogunleye OT; Attix FH; Paliwal BR
    Phys Med Biol; 1980 Mar; 25(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 7384208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Main dosimetric characteristics of some tissue-equivalent TL detectors.
    Miljanić S; Ranogajec-Komor M; Knezević Z; Vekić B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):437-42. PubMed ID: 12382916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the TL responses of two different preparations of LiF:Mg,Cu,P irradiated by photons of various energies.
    González PR; Furetta C; Azorín J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2007 Mar; 65(3):341-4. PubMed ID: 17085055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.
    Duggan L; Hood C; Warren-Forward H; Haque M; Kron T
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(17):3831-45. PubMed ID: 15470908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microdosimetric interpretation of the photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti detectors.
    Olko P; Bilski P; Kim JL
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):119-22. PubMed ID: 12382842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.