124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29283896)
1. Biological and Technical Complications of Splinted or Nonsplinted Dental Implants: A Decision Tree for Selection.
Ravidà A; Saleh MHA; Muriel MC; Maska B; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 29283896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should the restoration of adjacent implants be splinted or nonsplinted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Lemos CAA; Cruz RS; Oliveira HFF; Gomes JML; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 29961632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crestal Bone Loss Around Adjacent Dental Implants Restored with Splinted and Nonsplinted Fixed Restorations: A Systematic Literature Review.
Al Amri MD; Kellesarian SV
J Prosthodont; 2017 Aug; 26(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 27996179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Use of Splinted Versus Nonsplinted Prosthetic Design in Dental Implants: A Literature Review.
Al-Juboori MJ; Al-Attas MA; Minichetti J; Akhikar J
J Oral Implantol; 2024 Feb; 50(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 38329841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Splinting or Nonsplinting Adjacent Implants? A Retrospective Study Up to 15 Years: Part I-Biologic and Mechanical Complication Analysis.
Yi Y; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Koo KT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 May, Jun; 38(3):435-442a. PubMed ID: 37279228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of marginal bone loss, survival rate, and prosthetic complications in implant-supported splinted and nonsplinted restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shah AH; Patel P; Trivedi A; Shah A; Desai N; Talati M
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(2):111-121. PubMed ID: 36511022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of strains for splinted and nonsplinted screw-retained prostheses on short implants.
Yilmaz B; Seidt JD; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1176-82. PubMed ID: 22167421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of marginal bone level change of multiple adjacent implants restored with splinted and nonsplinted restorations: a 5-year prospective study.
Vigolo P; Zaccaria M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1189-94. PubMed ID: 21197497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival Rates of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses Supported by Short Dental Implants (≤8.5 mm): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Li QL; Yao MF; Cao RY; Zhao K; Wang XD
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jan; 31(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 34160869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients.
Rokni S; Todescan R; Watson P; Pharoah M; Adegbembo AO; Deporter D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 15747676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indications for splinting implant restorations.
Grossmann Y; Finger IM; Block MS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1642-52. PubMed ID: 16243182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical rationale for short implants in splinted restorations: an in vitro study.
Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 21479278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Splinting or Nonsplinting Adjacent Implants? A Retrospective Study Up to 15 Years: Part II-Success and Survival Rate Analysis.
Yi Y; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Koo KT
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023 May, Jun; 38(3):443-450b. PubMed ID: 37279229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of strains for splinted and nonsplinted implant prostheses using three-dimensional image correlation.
Clelland NL; Seidt JD; Daroz LG; McGlumphy EA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(5):953-9. PubMed ID: 20862409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Stress and Strain Distribution Around Splinted and Nonsplinted 6-mm Short Implants in Posterior Mandible: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
Meimandi M; Talebi Ardakani MR; Amid R; Mahmoudi Motlagh A; Beheshti S
Implant Dent; 2018 Feb; 27(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 29334509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photoelastic stress analysis of different designs of cement-retained fixed partial dentures on Morse taper oral implants.
Menani LR; Tiossi R; de Torres ÉM; Ribeiro RF; de Almeida RP
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):674-8. PubMed ID: 21415635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strain comparisons for splinted and nonsplinted cement-retained implant crowns.
Yilmaz B; Mess J; Seidt J; Clelland NL
Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 23626976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of splinting implant-supported crowns on the performance of adjacent posterior implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pascoal ALB; Paiva KRG; Marinho LCN; Bezerra ADS; Calderon PDS
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38955598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
