These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29284293)

  • 1. Assessment of Needle Tip Deflection During Transrectal Guided Prostate Biopsy: Implications for Targeted Biopsies.
    Halstuch D; Baniel J; Lifshitz D; Sela S; Ber Y; Margel D
    J Endourol; 2018 Mar; 32(3):252-256. PubMed ID: 29284293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: Quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis.
    Martin PR; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Fenster A; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):073504. PubMed ID: 24989418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal-based needle segmentation algorithm for transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy procedures.
    Cool DW; Gardi L; Romagnoli C; Saikaly M; Izawa JI; Fenster A
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1660-73. PubMed ID: 20443487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
    Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deflection Analysis of Different Needle Designs for Prostate Biopsy and Focal Therapy.
    Stone NN; Mouraviev V; Schechter D; Goetz J; Lucia MS; Smith EE; Crawford ED
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Oct; 16(5):654-661. PubMed ID: 27708117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
    Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results of a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted versus three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsies: Size does matter.
    Peltier A; Aoun F; Albisinni S; Marcelis Q; Ledinh D; Paesmans M; Lemort M; van Velthoven R
    Scand J Urol; 2016 Jun; 50(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 26754860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.
    Yarlagadda VK; Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Porter KK; Nix JW; Thomas JV; Rais-Bahrami S
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018; 24(3):115-120. PubMed ID: 29770762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective study analysing the effect of pain on probe insertion, and the biopsy strategy, on the patients' perception of pain during TRUS-guided biopsy of the prostate.
    Chopra S; Rowe EW; Laniado M; Patel A
    N Z Med J; 2008 Dec; 121(1287):39-43. PubMed ID: 19098966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High concordance of findings obtained from transgluteal magnetic resonance imaging - and transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy as compared with prostatectomy specimens.
    Steurer S; Rico SD; Simon R; Minner S; Tsourlakis MC; Krech T; Koop C; Graefen M; Heinzer H; Adam M; Huland H; Schlomm T; Sauter G; Lumiani A
    BJU Int; 2017 Sep; 120(3):365-376. PubMed ID: 28295933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transperineal biopsy prostate cancer detection in first biopsy and repeat biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: the Victorian Transperineal Biopsy Collaboration experience.
    Ong WL; Weerakoon M; Huang S; Paul E; Lawrentschuk N; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Murphy D; Grummet J
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116(4):568-76. PubMed ID: 25560926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving accuracy in image-guided prostate biopsy by using trocar-sharpened needles.
    Kuru TH; Simpfendörfer T; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    Urol Int; 2013; 91(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 23838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of real-time elastography on magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsies.
    Brock M; Löppenberg B; Roghmann F; Pelzer A; Dickmann M; Becker W; Martin-Seidel P; Sommerer F; Schenk L; Palisaar RJ; Noldus J; von Bodman C
    J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1191-7. PubMed ID: 25451832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate gland: value of 12 versus 6 cores.
    O'Connell MJ; Smith CS; Fitzpatrick PE; Keane CO; Fitzpatrick JM; Behan M; Fenlon HF; Murray JG
    Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 15160768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of image registration accuracy in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
    Karnik VV; Fenster A; Bax J; Cool DW; Gardi L; Gyacskov I; Romagnoli C; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):802-13. PubMed ID: 20229890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of prostate tumor targeting strategies using magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy.
    Martin PR; Cool DW; Fenster A; Ward AD
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1018-1028. PubMed ID: 29363762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Documenting the location of prostate biopsies with image fusion.
    Turkbey B; Xu S; Kruecker J; Locklin J; Pang Y; Bernardo M; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
    BJU Int; 2011 Jan; 107(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 20590543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First round of targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion compared with conventional transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies for the diagnosis of localised prostate cancer.
    Mozer P; Rouprêt M; Le Cossec C; Granger B; Comperat E; de Gorski A; Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 24552477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.