BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

559 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29284414)

  • 1. Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis.
    Liu T; Nie X; Wu Z; Zhang Y; Feng G; Cai S; Lv Y; Peng X
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29284414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can statistical adjustment guided by causal inference improve the accuracy of effect estimation? A simulation and empirical research based on meta-analyses of case-control studies.
    Yan R; Liu T; Peng Y; Peng X
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Dec; 20(1):333. PubMed ID: 33308213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The epidemiology of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and the weight of evidence argument.
    Kilpatrick SJ
    Int Surg; 1992; 77(2):131-3. PubMed ID: 1386592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A new strategy for meta-analysis of continuous covariates in observational studies.
    Sauerbrei W; Royston P
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(28):3341-60. PubMed ID: 21953493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association Between Alzheimer Disease and Cancer With Evaluation of Study Biases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Ospina-Romero M; Glymour MM; Hayes-Larson E; Mayeda ER; Graff RE; Brenowitz WD; Ackley SF; Witte JS; Kobayashi LC
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2025515. PubMed ID: 33185677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnitude and direction of missing confounders had different consequences on treatment effect estimation in propensity score analysis.
    Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Fontaine C; Daurès JP; Devereaux PJ; Landais P; Le Manach Y
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 87():87-97. PubMed ID: 28412467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
    ; Le TG; Ngo L; Mehta S; Do VD; Thach TQ; Vu XD; Nguyen DT; Cohen A
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Jun; (169):5-72; discussion 73-83. PubMed ID: 22849236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-analyses of observational and genetic association studies of folate intakes or levels and breast cancer risk.
    Lewis SJ; Harbord RM; Harris R; Smith GD
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Nov; 98(22):1607-22. PubMed ID: 17105984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accumulating evidence on passive and active smoking and breast cancer risk.
    Reynolds P; Hurley S; Goldberg D;
    Int J Cancer; 2006 Jul; 119(1):239; author reply 240-1. PubMed ID: 16432834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The confounder matrix: A tool to assess confounding bias in systematic reviews of observational studies of etiology.
    Petersen JM; Barrett M; Ahrens KA; Murray EJ; Bryant AS; Hogue CJ; Mumford SL; Gadupudi S; Fox MP; Trinquart L
    Res Synth Methods; 2022 Mar; 13(2):242-254. PubMed ID: 34954912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The alarming problems of confounding equivalence using logistic regression models in the perspective of causal diagrams.
    Yu Y; Li H; Sun X; Su P; Wang T; Liu Y; Yuan Z; Liu Y; Xue F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):177. PubMed ID: 29281984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating and correcting for confounder misclassification.
    Savitz DA; Barón AE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 May; 129(5):1062-71. PubMed ID: 2705426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and risk of breast cancer in nonsmoking women. An updated review and meta-analysis.
    Lee PN; Hamling JS
    Inhal Toxicol; 2016 Aug; 28(10):431-54. PubMed ID: 27541291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: reasons and implications for meta-analyses.
    Peters J; Mengersen K
    Eval Health Prof; 2008 Dec; 31(4):370-89. PubMed ID: 19000980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Environmental tobacco smoking, mutagen sensitivity, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Zhang ZF; Morgenstern H; Spitz MR; Tashkin DP; Yu GP; Hsu TC; Schantz SP
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Oct; 9(10):1043-9. PubMed ID: 11045786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confounding, causality, and confusion: the role of intermediate variables in interpreting observational studies in obstetrics.
    Ananth CV; Schisterman EF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 217(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 28427805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Active and passive smoking and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Macacu A; Autier P; Boniol M; Boyle P
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Nov; 154(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 26546245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.