561 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29284414)
21. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders.
Arah OA; Chiba Y; Greenland S
Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):637-46. PubMed ID: 18652982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does a more refined assessment of exposure to bitumen fume and confounders alter risk estimates from a nested case-control study of lung cancer among European asphalt workers?
Agostini M; Ferro G; Burstyn I; de Vocht F; Portengen L; Olsson A; Boffetta P; Kromhout H;
Occup Environ Med; 2013 Mar; 70(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23322919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Is there an association between passive smoking and breast cancer?
Khuder SA; Simon VJ
Eur J Epidemiol; 2000; 16(12):1117-21. PubMed ID: 11484800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bias due to non-differential misclassification of polytomous confounders.
Brenner H
J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Jan; 46(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 8433115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies.
Barrowman MA; Peek N; Lambie M; Martin GP; Sperrin M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31366331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Confounder adjustment in observational comparative effectiveness researches: (1) statistical adjustment approaches for measured confounder].
Huang LL; Wei YY; Chen F
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 40(10):1304-1309. PubMed ID: 31658535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Difficulties in assessing the relationship between passive smoking and lung cancer.
Lee PN
Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Jun; 7(2):137-63. PubMed ID: 9654639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Risk adjustment effect on stroke clinical trials.
Johnston KC; Connors AF; Wagner DP; Haley EC
Stroke; 2004 Feb; 35(2):e43-5. PubMed ID: 14715975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Adjusted Analyses in Studies Addressing Therapy and Harm: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Shah ND; O'Donnell M; Guyatt GH
JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(7):748-759. PubMed ID: 28241362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
Vavken P; Dorotka R
J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A simulation study on matched case-control designs in the perspective of causal diagrams.
Li H; Yuan Z; Su P; Wang T; Yu Y; Sun X; Xue F
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16(1):102. PubMed ID: 27543263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Lack of an association between passive smoking and incidence of female breast cancer in non-smokers: evidence from 10 prospective cohort studies.
Yang Y; Zhang F; Skrip L; Wang Y; Liu S
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e77029. PubMed ID: 24204725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Estimating a summarized odds ratio whilst eliminating publication bias in meta-analysis.
Sugita M; Kanamori M; Izuno T; Miyakawa M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 1992 Oct; 22(5):354-8. PubMed ID: 1469797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Calculating the "number needed to be exposed" with adjustment for confounding variables in epidemiological studies.
Bender R; Blettner M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2002 May; 55(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 12007557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].
Timmer A
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The importance of adjusting for potential confounders in Bayesian hierarchical models synthesising evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies: an application comparing treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms.
McCarron CE; Pullenayegum EM; Thabane L; Goeree R; Tarride JE
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jul; 10():64. PubMed ID: 20618973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A meta-analysis of passive smoking and risk of developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Wei X; E M; Yu S
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2015 Jan; 107(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 25488377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Bilandzic A; Fitzpatrick T; Rosella L; Henry D
PLoS Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1001987. PubMed ID: 27046153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.
Begg CB; Mazumdar M
Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1088-101. PubMed ID: 7786990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
