These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29284417)

  • 1. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships between abstract features and methodological quality explained variations of social media activity derived from systematic reviews about psoriasis interventions.
    Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Isla-Tejera B; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; Gómez-García F; García-Nieto AV
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():35-43. PubMed ID: 29803759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Alcalde-Mellado P; Maestre-López B; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 92():79-88. PubMed ID: 28893571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on psoriasis: role of funding sources, conflict of interest and bibliometric indices as predictors of methodological quality.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gay-Mimbrera J; Maestre-Lopez B; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Carmona-Fernández PJ; González-Padilla M; Vélez García-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
    Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 28192600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological and reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the association between sleep duration and hypertension.
    Yang Q; Xian H; Cheng X; Wu X; Meng J; Chen W; Zeng Z
    Syst Rev; 2024 Aug; 13(1):211. PubMed ID: 39107813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Author-paper affiliation network architecture influences the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of psoriasis.
    Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Ruano J; Gomez-Garcia F; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Maestre-Lopez B; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Velez Garcia-Nieto A; Isla-Tejera B
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175419. PubMed ID: 28403245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the abstract reporting of systematic reviews of dose-response meta-analysis: a literature survey.
    Jia PL; Xu B; Cheng JM; Huang XH; Kwong JSW; Liu Y; Zhang C; Han Y; Xu C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):148. PubMed ID: 31307388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals.
    Seehra J; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2013 Apr; 121(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 23489893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.
    Riado Minguez D; Kowalski M; Vallve Odena M; Longin Pontzen D; Jelicic Kadic A; Jeric M; Dosenovic S; Jakus D; Vrdoljak M; Poklepovic Pericic T; Sapunar D; Puljak L
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1348-1354. PubMed ID: 28678074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting.
    Vásquez-Cárdenas J; Zapata-Noreña Ó; Carvajal-Flórez Á; Barbosa-Liz DM; Giannakopoulos NN; Faggion CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):442-452.e12. PubMed ID: 31582116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?
    Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K
    Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.
    Pussegoda K; Turner L; Garritty C; Mayhew A; Skidmore B; Stevens A; Boutron I; Sarkis-Onofre R; Bjerre LM; Hróbjartsson A; Altman DG; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 6(1):131. PubMed ID: 28720117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    Shea B; Boers M; Grimshaw JM; Hamel C; Bouter LM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review of the quality of distal radius systematic reviews: Methodology and reporting assessment.
    Belloti JC; Okamura A; Scheeren J; Faloppa F; Ynoe de Moraes V
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0206895. PubMed ID: 30673700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 115.