151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29285044)
1. Metabolic Activity of Normal Glandular Tissue on
An YS; Jung Y; Kim JY; Han S; Kang DK; Park SY; Kim TH
J Breast Cancer; 2017 Dec; 20(4):386-392. PubMed ID: 29285044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metabolic changes in breast cancer on dual-time-point
Kim HO; Kim BS; Kang SY; Bang JI; An J; Kim JH; Yoon HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Dec; 34(12):942-951. PubMed ID: 32974848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement indicate metabolic activity? Qualitative and 3D quantitative computer imaging analysis.
Mema E; Mango VL; Guo X; Karcich J; Yeh R; Wynn RT; Zhao B; Ha RS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Mar; 47(3):753-759. PubMed ID: 28646614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative Assessment of Breast Parenchymal Uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT: Correlation with Age, Background Parenchymal Enhancement, and Amount of Fibroglandular Tissue on MRI.
Leithner D; Baltzer PA; Magometschnigg HF; Wengert GJ; Karanikas G; Helbich TH; Weber M; Wadsak W; Pinker K
J Nucl Med; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1518-1522. PubMed ID: 27230924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Physiological background parenchymal uptake of
Shimizu Y; Satake H; Ishigaki S; Shimamoto K; Uota F; Tadokoro M; Sato T; Kato K; Ishiguchi T; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 36(8):728-735. PubMed ID: 35610443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population.
Kershah S; Partovi S; Traughber BJ; Muzic RF; Schluchter MD; O'Donnell JK; Faulhaber P
Mol Imaging Biol; 2013 Dec; 15(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 23632951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preliminary analysis: Background parenchymal 18F-FDG uptake in breast cancer patients appears to correlate with background parenchymal enhancement and to vary by distance from the index cancer.
Kim E; Mema E; Axelrod D; Sigmund E; Kim SG; Babb J; Melsaether AN
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():163-168. PubMed ID: 30599855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multiparametric
Leithner D; Helbich TH; Bernard-Davila B; Marino MA; Avendano D; Martinez DF; Jochelson MS; Kapetas P; Baltzer PAT; Haug A; Hacker M; Tanyildizi Y; Morris EA; Pinker K
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jan; 61(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 31253745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative analysis of background parenchymal enhancement in whole breast on MRI: Influence of menstrual cycle and comparison with a qualitative analysis.
Jung Y; Jeong SK; Kang DK; Moon Y; Kim TH
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jun; 103():84-89. PubMed ID: 29803391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between functional imaging markers derived from diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT in esophageal cancer.
Goense L; Heethuis SE; van Rossum PSN; Voncken FEM; Lagendijk JJW; Lam MGEH; Terhaard CH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; Mook S; van Lier ALHMW; Lin SH; Meijer GJ
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jan; 39(1):60-67. PubMed ID: 29023336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semiquantitative Assessment of
Minamimoto R; Xu G; Jamali M; Holley D; Barkhodari A; Zaharchuk G; Iagaru A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 28777652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of
Mayoral M; Paredes P; Saco A; Fusté P; Perlaza P; Tapias A; Fernandez-Martinez A; Vidal L; Ordi J; Pavia J; Martinez-Roman S; Lomeña F
Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2018; 37(2):80-86. PubMed ID: 28869177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Zhou W; Wen J; Hua F; Xu W; Lu X; Yin B; Geng D; Guan Y
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():26-32. PubMed ID: 29857862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Association of Clinical Factors and Degree of Early Background Parenchymal Enhancement on Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Wang S; Sun Y; You C; Jiang T; Yang M; Shen X; Qian M; Duan S; Lynn HS; Li R; Gu Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jul; 221(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 36695647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of
Jena A; Taneja S; Singh A; Negi P; Sarin R; Das PK; Singhal M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 28678576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of focal hypermetabolic thyroid incidentaloma: An analysis with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography parameters.
Lee H; Chung YS; Lee JH; Lee KY; Hwang KH
World J Clin Cases; 2022 Jan; 10(1):155-165. PubMed ID: 35071515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
