These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29285469)

  • 1. Bonding System Choice and Practices among Senior Dental Students.
    Nassar H; El-Shamy H
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2017 Nov; 7(Suppl 3):S143-S148. PubMed ID: 29285469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry.
    Ozer F; Blatz MB
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Jan; 34(1):12-4, 16, 18; quiz 20, 30. PubMed ID: 23550327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch?
    Frankenberger R; Lohbauer U; Roggendorf MJ; Naumann M; Taschner M
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):339-44. PubMed ID: 19058678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P; Mahallati R; Bazos P; So WS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems.
    Knobloch LA; Gailey D; Azer S; Johnston WM; Clelland N; Kerby RE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 17499091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schroeder M; Correa IC; Bauer J; Loguercio AD; Reis A
    J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():36-53. PubMed ID: 28495559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers.
    Maleknejad F; Moosavi H; Shahriari R; Sarabi N; Shayankhah T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 May; 10(3):18-26. PubMed ID: 19430622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.
    Frankenberger R; Tay FR
    Dent Mater; 2005 May; 21(5):397-412. PubMed ID: 15826696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Etch-and-rinse vs self-etch mode for dentin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives.
    Yamauchi K; Tsujimoto A; Jurado CA; Shimatani Y; Nagura Y; Takamizawa T; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
    J Oral Sci; 2019 Nov; 61(4):549-553. PubMed ID: 31631096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microtensile Bond Strength of Composite to Enamel Using Universal Adhesive with/without Acid Etching Compared To Etch and Rinse and Self-Etch Bonding Agents.
    Pouyanfar H; Tabaii ES; Aghazadeh S; Nobari SPTN; Imani MM
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 6(11):2186-2192. PubMed ID: 30559887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1371-9. PubMed ID: 25359327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
    Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles?
    Chen C; Niu LN; Xie H; Zhang ZY; Zhou LQ; Jiao K; Chen JH; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):525-36. PubMed ID: 25797702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of saliva contamination on microleakage of an etch-and-rinse and a self-etching adhesive.
    Yazici AR; Tuncer D; Dayangaç B; Ozgünaltay G; Onen A
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Jun; 9(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 17655070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-year Clinical Evaluation of Resin Composite Restorations of Noncarious Cervical Lesions in Smokers.
    de Carvalho LD; Gondo R; Lopes GC
    J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 26525004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.