These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2928564)

  • 21. [The use of digital techniques with storage phosphors for orthopantomography. Preliminary note].
    Nessi R; Blanc M; Marzano L; Gattoni F; Weinstein R; Uslenghi C
    Radiol Med; 1992 Oct; 84(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 1455032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Radiologic study of the thorax using the digital method (FCR 101). Evaluation of various parameters as related to exposure].
    Perri G; Battolla L; Palla L; D'Alessandro F; Torri T; Tagliagambe A
    Radiol Med; 1991; 82(1-2):84-8. PubMed ID: 1896586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital spot-film fluorography.
    Morgan D
    Radiogr Today; 1990 Jul; 56(638):9-11. PubMed ID: 2222795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A method of estimating doses in digital luminescent radiography].
    Bick U; Fiebich M; Lenzen H; Wiesmann W; Peters PE
    Radiologe; 1991 Jan; 31(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 2006256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of contrast dose reduction for excretory urography using computed radiography.
    Strautman PR; Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ; Yoshino MT; Boyle RR; Fritz H; Mockbee WB
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 9(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 2731558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Preliminary results with digital luminescence radiography in radiotherapy].
    Reichelt S; Prokop M; Oestmann JW; Schulte RM; Renner KH; Galanski M
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1990 Jul; 166(7):483-6. PubMed ID: 2382211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography during excretory urography: our experience.
    Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 2085269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Proposal of a conversion and processing system of digital images].
    Cavallo V; Giovagnorio F; Messineo D
    Radiol Med; 1991 Sep; 82(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 1947251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Use of digital luminescence radiography in voiding cystourethrography].
    Gocke C; Gocke P; Müller RD; Krege S; Goepel M; Langer R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 Mar; 6(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 8679729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of input grey values and contrast profiles: a contribution to the discussion on optimization of evaluation parameters in storage phosphorus radiography].
    Schätzl M; Fink U
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 7881084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Traditional and digital urography compared. The authors' own experience].
    Cervi PM; Bighi S; Merlo L; Lupi L; Vita G
    Radiol Med; 1990 Apr; 79(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 2377752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Clinical evaluation of Fuji computed radiography (FCR) by physicians including non-radiologists].
    Akita S; Oda J; Shiina M; Sakai K
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1990 Apr; 35(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 2355649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of digital imaging on radiation doses to the patient during X-ray examination of the urinary tract.
    Sjöholm B; Geijer H; Persliden J
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Oct; 46(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 16334851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Excretory urography using computed radiography.
    Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ; Hunter TB; Claypool HR; Westerman BR; Mockbee B
    Radiology; 1987 Feb; 162(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 3797646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital urography using stimulable phosphor. An experimental study in the rabbit.
    Pettersson H; Aspelin P; Boijsen E
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 2968094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Pediatric musculoskeletal computed radiography.
    Kottamasu SR; Kuhns LR; Stringer DA
    Pediatr Radiol; 1997 Jul; 27(7):563-75. PubMed ID: 9211947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Excretory urography with non-ionic contrast medium; clinical reassessment of the necessity of water deprivation].
    Soga T; Maeda M; Mitsumori M; Kusui T; Hayakawa K
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Feb; 34(2):233-6. PubMed ID: 2754819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Clinical and technical experiences with digital luminescent radiography in phlebography of the leg].
    Schwermer B; Witte G; Nicolas V; Bücheler E
    Rofo; 1990 Feb; 152(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 2155447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Digital radiography. Experiences with the SP system].
    Hintze A; Jötten G
    Rofo; 1986 Jul; 145(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 3016828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of computed radiography for routine linear accelerator and simulator quality control.
    Patel I; Natarajan T; Hassan SS; Kirby MC
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 82(982):827-38. PubMed ID: 19398464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.