These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2928564)

  • 81. [Radiation exposure of patients examined by a digital x-ray unit].
    Volobuev AI; Denisov PI; Kokhanskiĭ IN; Khabakhpashev AG; Shekhtman LI
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1989; (1):59-62. PubMed ID: 2718363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Low-dose digital urography in the pregnant patient.
    Albert SA; Richter JO; Rosenfield AT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 156(4):926-8. PubMed ID: 3555081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. [The quality of urography with iopamidol and various diuretic agents].
    Stacul F; Bazzocchi M; Zanella F; Abbona M; Ukovich W
    Radiol Med; 1987; 74(1-2):93-6. PubMed ID: 3112869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Use of additives to contrast media to improve imaging in plain film and computed tomography urography.
    Krause W; Schromm M
    Invest Radiol; 2003 Jan; 38(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 12496517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Performance characteristics of a laser scanner and laser printer system for radiological imaging.
    Lo SC; Taira RK; Mankovich NJ; Huang HK; Takeuchi H
    Comput Radiol; 1986; 10(5):227-37. PubMed ID: 3802789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. The laser film digitizer: density, contrast, and resolution.
    Teslow TN
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):128-32. PubMed ID: 9268857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Optimal image resolution for digital storage of radiotherapy-planning images.
    Baba Y; Furusawa M; Murakami R; Baba T; Yokoyama T; Nishimura R; Takahashi M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jul; 41(4):955-7. PubMed ID: 9652864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. [A trial of digitization and digital analysis from analogue clinical images of the renal cancer].
    Mikata N; Imao S; Tanaka Y; Horiuchi D
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Jan; 80(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 2657158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. [Pelvic lipomatosis as a "natural contrast medium" in digital radiography of the small pelvis].
    Schratter M; Gruber I; Horak B; Seklehner V
    Rofo; 1994 Dec; 161(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 7803784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Digitization and image processing methods for enhancement and quantification of grazing-incidence x-ray topographs.
    Rheinländer J; Abdali S; Zielinska-Rohozinska E
    J Xray Sci Technol; 1994 Jan; 4(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 21307460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Quantitative radiographic imaging using a photostimulable phosphor system.
    Floyd CE; Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 2385203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. A quality-control phantom for digitization of radiographs.
    Halpern EJ; Esser PD; Nickoloff EL; Alderson PO
    J Digit Imaging; 1990 Feb; 3(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 2092803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Clinical assessment of phosphor-plate computed radiography: equipment, strategy, and methods.
    Hillman BJ; Fajardo LL
    J Digit Imaging; 1989 Nov; 2(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 2488167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. [An evaluation of computed radiography in contrast-enhanced imaging of the gastric area].
    Tatsu Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1997 Oct; 57(12):775-82. PubMed ID: 9394566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. The use of storage phosphors for portal imaging in radiation therapy: therapists' perception of image quality.
    Gur D; Deutsch M; Fuhrman CR; Clayton PA; Weiser JC; Rosenthal MS; Bukovitz AG
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 2921972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. [Picture quality of a digital urogram using image enhancement radiography].
    Scholz A; Langer M; Zwicker C; Felix R
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1989 Mar; 9(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2706888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Comparison between different cost devices for digital capture of X-ray films: an image characteristics detection approach.
    Salazar AJ; Camacho JC; Aguirre DA
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Feb; 25(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 21614654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Visual contrast enhancement with a patterned overlay.
    Kunin M; Phillips JJ; Schwarz G
    Radiology; 1988 Apr; 167(1):271-3. PubMed ID: 3347732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Digital radiography reject analysis of examinations with multiple rejects: an Australian emergency imaging department clinical audit.
    Stephenson-Smith B; Neep MJ; Rowntree P
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 68(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 33826800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Digital tomographic filtering of radiographs.
    Costa JM; Venetsanopoulos AN; Trefler M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1983; 2(2):76-88. PubMed ID: 18234591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.